Mike Riley will be deciding whether to whisper in the refs ear though.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
World Cup VAR
- Thread starter stonerblue
- Start date
The system relies on the officials deciding what should be looked at.
Yep, and they got a load of decisions correct.. a vast improvement over the old system
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Totally,disagree.. current system allows ref to say I didn't see it properly, a complete get out of jail card. And there's absoloutly no come back from that. Game over
The VAR system takes this away completely.... we've already seen refs sent home for not applying the process correctly.
No it doesn't.
They can look at it on replay (if told) & in most cases find a way of not giving it & be correct & have people back them up
Like tonight. Spain had a blatant pen. Ex FIFA ref Clattenburg came up with nonexistent rule on tv to say they didn't & everyone agrees.
Mike Riley will be deciding whether to whisper in the refs ear though.
You may well be right, but let's give it a chance to see if it's no better than the old corrupt system. It will probably be corrupt, just less so. I'd take that after what we've put up with for so long
No it doesn't.
They can look at it on replay (if told) & in most cases find a way of not giving it & be correct & have people back them up
Like tonight. Spain had a blatant pen. Ex FIFA ref Clattenburg came up with nonexistent rule on tv to say they didn't & everyone agrees.
Totally at odds with the evidence we've seen at the World Cup.... but keep peddling this fantasy
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Yep, and they got a load of decisions correct.. a vast improvement over the old system
No, they got most decisions correct without v.a.r.
The improvements are the ones which only involve computers.
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
The system relies on the officials deciding what should be looked at.
But the current system relies on ‘bent’ officials making decisions which can’t be over turned.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Totally at odds with the evidence we've seen at the World Cup.... but keep peddling this fantasy
?
I'm talking about Spain tonight. It's a pen according to the rules, but for tonight they have been changed so it isn't.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
But the current system relies on ‘bent’ officials making decisions which can’t be over turned.
This one allows them to overturn ones where they have gone too far being being bent & be handed another chance to get you later just by interpreting the rules to their liking.
A ref needn't ever make another mistake ever but can engineer almost any game just by picking which incidents to penalise
No, they got most decisions correct without v.a.r.
The improvements are the ones which only involve computers.
No they didn't, Pmsl.... 19 key VAR decisions, 18 corrected initial incorrect decisions.
This is the twat who will be in charge of VAR.
This is the twat that is charge of the existing system.... I know I'd rather have as much as possible sense checked than not! That's the lesser of two evils big style
But the current system relies on ‘bent’ officials making decisions which can’t be over turned.
BINGO
?
I'm talking about Spain tonight. It's a pen according to the rules, but for tonight they have been changed so it isn't.
They were both pulling each other, how many times...
This one allows them to overturn ones where they have gone too far being being bent & be handed another chance to get you later just by interpreting the rules to their liking.
A ref needn't ever make another mistake ever but can engineer almost any game just by picking which incidents to penalise
That's what the old system allows... Pmsl
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
No they didn't, Pmsl.... 19 key VAR decisions, 18 corrected initial incorrect decisions.
I've already said I'm not having the v.a.r. stats for reasons amready mentioned.
But I'm talking about typical reffing performances in competitions.
They will tell you they statistically get most decisions right same as now.
Both are bollocks.
I've already said I'm not having the v.a.r. stats for reasons amready mentioned.
But I'm talking about typical reffing performances in competitions.
They will tell you they statistically get most decisions right same as now.
Both are bollocks.
So name the specific ones they got wrong? Like others I've asked, I'll be amazed if you do.. but maybe you'll surprise me!!
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
They were both pulling each other, how many times...
No they weren't.
The Russian pulled the Spanish player.
That is a penalty.
The rules have been changed for tonight, to include what happened next, which is the Spanish player then fouling back.
That shouldn't matter. The pen should be given for the initial foul.
But that would have likely put the host country out of the World Cup.
So instead of stopping the video at the moment the foul occurs, they pmay it on & find a reason not to give it.
Bent.
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
This one allows them to overturn ones where they have gone too far being being bent & be handed another chance to get you later just by interpreting the rules to their liking.
A ref needn't ever make another mistake ever but can engineer almost any game just by picking which incidents to penalise
I think you’re a tad paranoid.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
So name the specific ones they got wrong? Like others I've asked, I'll be amazed if you do.. but maybe you'll surprise me!!
I can't actually remember which ones used v.a.r. & which didn't. Tonight was corrupt imo
I just know they all should use it or none should, so, imo there have been loads of similar incidents given opposite decisions & it makes a nonsense of having it at all.