Would the Beatles and the Rolling Stones be better without Ringo and Charlie.

[Kiss this guy]

Just wondering.

 

[dublinblue12]

Not sure if the songs would be the same with no drummer

 

[urban genie]

No

 

[bluethrunthru]

this was a discussion for the internet in @1963 surely?

 

[Bill Walker]

Not sure if the songs would be the same with no drummer

Haha

But the answer is No. They were both perfect for their bands.

 

[tosh1]

Beatles, no. Rolling stones would have been better without the rolling stones.

 

[Bill Walker]

Always liked Ringo's drumming on this



and this..

 

[denislawsbackheel]

Ringo was shit.
Charlie was a genius.

 

[dickie davies]

Is Ringo a slang term for a recreational drug?

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

Ringo was a much better drummer than people give him credit for, but the Beatles would've been better without his songwriting input.