Would the UK ever "revolt"

pominoz said:
What defines "working class" these days in the UK, only having one 40 inch flat screen tv?

What are people going to revolt about ?

Even bone idle pissheads seem to have an easy life from reading threads on here.

Is the problem that workers are worse off than non workers?

Genuine question.

It is easy to be financially worse off if you have to use privatised public transport to get to work, or use a vehicle with the highest road charges and insurance in europe and do it on the minimum wage. The gospel according to the resident thatcherites on BM is that £65 per week is utopia and everyone unemployed is a parasite and should be shot. 200 applicants for every vacancy outside london, 40 in london means the country is fucked for a majority of the population. When the daily mail readers start joining the dole queues they will have a taste of the paradise that they insist is life on the dole. Bring it on
 
dannybcity said:
pominoz said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
Give or take the odd Brazilian electrician who looked fuck all like an al qaeda terrorist but got shot in the back at point blank range anyway.

What does an Al Qaeda terrorist look like ?

They'd have probably have found out if the guy charged with watching him hadn't gone for a piss.

That does not answer the question.
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
gaudinho's stolen car said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Put it this way a lot of people sleep better now

Was it the right decision, the inquiry will let me know

Of course it wasn't the right decision they shot an unarmed man.

The term unarmed is subjective in some cases


Jean Charles De Menezes was not carrying a weapon of any kind.
I think most legal professionals would view this as unarmed.
Subjectivity doesn't come into it.
An innocent man was killed.
The enquiry may well establish the motivation as to why he was killed,but the fact that he was innocent and unarmed automatically means that it was an error of judgement.
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
gaudinho's stolen car said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
The term unarmed is subjective in some cases

In this case the term means that he was unarmed.
The IPCC stated that a loaded Bruni BBM blank-firing pistol converted to fire live rounds was recovered from the scene. The IPCC had commissioned tests on the pistol by the Forensic Science Service and had received advice that it was an illegal firearm.

I just read wikipedia to!
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
gaudinho's stolen car said:
Of course it wasn't the right decision they shot an unarmed man.

The term unarmed is subjective in some cases


Jean Charles De Menezes was not carrying a weapon of any kind.
I think most legal professionals would view this as unarmed.
Subjectivity doesn't come into it.
An innocent man was killed.
The enquiry may well establish the motivation as to why he was killed,but the fact that he was innocent and unarmed automatically means that it was an error of judgement.

I was talking about Mark Duggan not De Menezes
Its where this whole off shoot started from (excuse the pun)
 
pominoz said:
dannybcity said:
pominoz said:
What does an Al Qaeda terrorist look like ?

They'd have probably have found out if the guy charged with watching him hadn't gone for a piss.

That does not answer the question.

Yes it does, they made a mistake and shot a man dead which supports my original point that police shouldn't be using live ammunition.
 
dannybcity said:
pominoz said:
dannybcity said:
They'd have probably have found out if the guy charged with watching him hadn't gone for a piss.

That does not answer the question.

Yes it does, they made a mistake and shot a man dead which supports my original point that police shouldn't be using live ammunition.

The original argument was about Mark Duggan being shot which started a riot

No one rioted after the Brazilian guy
 
pominoz said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
dannybcity said:
I don't think our police force should be going around shooting anybody with live rounds to be honest.


Give or take the odd Brazilian electrician who looked fuck all like an al qaeda terrorist but got shot in the back at point blank range anyway.

What does an Al Qaeda terrorist look like ?


Shifty looking beardy Islamic types.
Usually reciting passages from the Qur'an.
Wearing a semtex belt.
Not South American.
They have a multicoloured poncho and play pan pipes,whilst wearing a sombrero.
See?
Totally different.
 
dannybcity said:
pominoz said:
dannybcity said:
They'd have probably have found out if the guy charged with watching him hadn't gone for a piss.

That does not answer the question.

Yes it does, they made a mistake and shot a man dead which supports my original point that police shouldn't be using live ammunition.

What should the police around Toulouse be carrying at the moment?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.