Would the UK ever "revolt"

[nijinsky's fetlocks]

What does an Al Qaeda terrorist look like ?

Shifty looking beardy Islamic types.
Usually reciting passages from the Qur'an.
Wearing a semtex belt.
Not South American.
They have a multicoloured poncho and play pan pipes,whilst wearing a sombrero.
See?
Totally different.

Oh, i see.

Here is an Islamic terrorist organization trained Aussie, he did'nt try to blend in with his terrorist mates, did he.

He is clearly a bender Australian sympathiser who has read our 'gay marriage' thread and is angry.
Wait 'til he finds out the Taliban stance on homosexuality.

 

[pominoz]

Shifty looking beardy Islamic types.
Usually reciting passages from the Qur'an.
Wearing a semtex belt.
Not South American.
They have a multicoloured poncho and play pan pipes,whilst wearing a sombrero.
See?
Totally different.

Oh, i see.

Here is an Islamic terrorist organization trained Aussie, he did'nt try to blend in with his terrorist mates, did he.

He is clearly a bender Australian sympathiser who has read our 'gay marriage' thread and is angry.
Wait 'til he finds out the Taliban stance on homosexuality.

After his 6 years in Guantanamo bay, i am sure he has felt the full brunt of their stance on gays. Plus a few US military probes.

 

[metalblue]

Of course it wasn't the right decision they shot an unarmed man.

The term unarmed is subjective in some cases

Jean Charles De Menezes was not carrying a weapon of any kind.
I think most legal professionals would view this as unarmed.
Subjectivity doesn't come into it.
An innocent man was killed.
The enquiry may well establish the motivation as to why he was killed,but the fact that he was innocent and unarmed automatically means that it was an error of judgement.

It's also, cough cough, "possible" he was off his tits on coke. Things aren't always clear cut but it was a accumulation of errors.

 

[BoyBlue_1985]

Oh, i see.

Here is an Islamic terrorist organization trained Aussie, he did'nt try to blend in with his terrorist mates, did he.

He is clearly a bender Australian sympathiser who has read our 'gay marriage' thread and is angry.
Wait 'til he finds out the Taliban stance on homosexuality.

After his 6 years in Guantanamo bay, i am sure he has felt the full brunt of their stance on gays. Plus a few US military probes.

Dont understand why people moan about Guantanamo Bay. i would pay good money to get probed on Holiday in Cuba<br /><br />-- Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:46 am --<br /><br />

The term unarmed is subjective in some cases

Jean Charles De Menezes was not carrying a weapon of any kind.
I think most legal professionals would view this as unarmed.
Subjectivity doesn't come into it.
An innocent man was killed.
The enquiry may well establish the motivation as to why he was killed,but the fact that he was innocent and unarmed automatically means that it was an error of judgement.

It's also, cough cough, "possible" he was off his tits on coke. Things aren't always clear cut but it was a accumulation of errors.

I work with someone who lived up the road from him. Not many tears were shed outside his family and gang who terrorise everyone in the area when he was shot

 

[Josh Blue]

Surely the people would rise up and say No to war against Iran, whether USA and Israel be involved or not.

If you really believe that my friend then i hold out little hope for you coming back to the real world

fair comment

 

[pominoz]

He is clearly a bender Australian sympathiser who has read our 'gay marriage' thread and is angry.
Wait 'til he finds out the Taliban stance on homosexuality.

After his 6 years in Guantanamo bay, i am sure he has felt the full brunt of their stance on gays. Plus a few US military probes.

Dont understand why people moan about Guantanamo Bay. i would pay good money to get probed on Holiday in Cuba

-- Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:46 am --

Jean Charles De Menezes was not carrying a weapon of any kind.
I think most legal professionals would view this as unarmed.
Subjectivity doesn't come into it.
An innocent man was killed.
The enquiry may well establish the motivation as to why he was killed,but the fact that he was innocent and unarmed automatically means that it was an error of judgement.

It's also, cough cough, "possible" he was off his tits on coke. Things aren't always clear cut but it was a accumulation of errors.

I work with someone who lived up the road from him. Not many tears were shed outside his family and gang who terrorise everyone in the area when he was shot

Each to their own, mate.

Back to the cops with guns issue, all cops over here carry guns and you know not to fuck with them, as they will fuck you up. Hence, we have very few times when cops do have to shoot.

 

[inchy14]

I don't think our police force should be going around shooting anybody with live rounds to be honest.

Should they be shooting them with blanks?

"bang bang, your dead"

Or as Eddie Murphy once said, " this is the police, stop, or i'll shout stop again"

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Oh, i see.

Here is an Islamic terrorist organization trained Aussie, he did'nt try to blend in with his terrorist mates, did he.

He is clearly a bender Australian sympathiser who has read our 'gay marriage' thread and is angry.
Wait 'til he finds out the Taliban stance on homosexuality.

After his 6 years in Guantanamo bay, i am sure he has felt the full brunt of their stance on gays. Plus a few US military probes.

looks like Robert Carlyle.

 

[gaudinho's stolen car]

After his 6 years in Guantanamo bay, i am sure he has felt the full brunt of their stance on gays. Plus a few US military probes.

Dont understand why people moan about Guantanamo Bay. i would pay good money to get probed on Holiday in Cuba

-- Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:46 am --

It's also, cough cough, "possible" he was off his tits on coke. Things aren't always clear cut but it was a accumulation of errors.

I work with someone who lived up the road from him. Not many tears were shed outside his family and gang who terrorise everyone in the area when he was shot

Each to their own, mate.

Back to the cops with guns issue, all cops over here carry guns and you know not to fuck with them, as they will fuck you up. Hence, we have very few times when cops do have to shoot.

Over here, our police usually don't carry guns, so they don't shoot anyone. When an armed officer does, there's an investigation, thank God. We don't get "fucked up" when we are unarmed, usually.

 

[nijinsky's fetlocks]

The term unarmed is subjective in some cases

Jean Charles De Menezes was not carrying a weapon of any kind.
I think most legal professionals would view this as unarmed.
Subjectivity doesn't come into it.
An innocent man was killed.
The enquiry may well establish the motivation as to why he was killed,but the fact that he was innocent and unarmed automatically means that it was an error of judgement.

It's also, cough cough, "possible" he was off his tits on coke. Things aren't always clear cut but it was a accumulation of errors.

In fairness mate,I have been off my tits on coke in the past,but was hardly expecting an armed tactical aid response team to come storming through my front door to shoot me dead for it.