Would You Accept A Rapist Playing For City?

[blueincy]

Why did one of them who also did not get consent get cleared then?

How do you know who did or didn't get consent?

It was stated in court.

The victim told police she had no memory of the incident and believed her drinks had been spiked.
So with that in mind, no consent was given or was it? If so why was Clayton cleared but Ched not?
If she had no memory of the incident how do the Jury know she didn't give consent?

It's clear to me This was two lads out on the piss having sex with one girl who by all indications agreed with it but woke the next morning feeling guilty. Maybe she couldn't look her boyfriend in the face after what she had done?
If it was Rape and she thought her drink was spiked why wasn't blood tests done to prove it?
Why was Clayton released without charge if she said she didn't remember the night? "RAPE IS ALL ABOUT CONSENT"

 

[blueincy]

Would just like to interject,
Would you accept a child rapist, with a lot of people on here saying he's done his time so he should be allowed to ply his trade, would the same attitudes be applied if it was a child involved...

You are talking about a Pedophile a Nonce a sick bastard so your interjection is totally without substance.

 

[dobobobo]

Would just like to interject,
Would you accept a child rapist, with a lot of people on here saying he's done his time so he should be allowed to ply his trade, would the same attitudes be applied if it was a child involved...

You are talking about a Pedophile a Nonce a sick bastard so your interjection is totally without substance.

Not it isn't, read again.

 

[dobobobo]

How do you know who did or didn't get consent?

It was stated in court.

The victim told police she had no memory of the incident and believed her drinks had been spiked.
So with that in mind, no consent was given or was it? If so why was Clayton cleared but Ched not?
If she had no memory of the incident how do the Jury know she didn't give consent?

It's clear to me This was two lads out on the piss having sex with one girl who by all indications agreed with it but woke the next morning feeling guilty. Maybe she couldn't look her boyfriend in the face after what she had done?
If it was Rape and she thought her drink was spiked why wasn't blood tests done to prove it?
Why was Clayton released without charge if she said she didn't remember the night? "RAPE IS ALL ABOUT CONSENT"

If you know so much about the case why weren't you at court?

 

[Tanzeylee]

Would just like to interject,
Would you accept a child rapist, with a lot of people on here saying he's done his time so he should be allowed to ply his trade, would the same attitudes be applied if it was a child involved...

You are talking about a Pedophile a Nonce a sick bastard so your interjection is totally without substance.

Well not really, how can sex crimes be differentiated, rapist of whatever the age of the person are sick bastards, so by saying it is without substance are u saying it's ok to rape a 17yo but not a 14yo, rape is rape no matter what the age is, it's a horrible crime...

 

[Puppet Master Silva]

Would just like to interject,
Would you accept a child rapist, with a lot of people on here saying he's done his time so he should be allowed to ply his trade, would the same attitudes be applied if it was a child involved...

You are talking about a Pedophile a Nonce a sick bastard so your interjection is totally without substance.

I don't think you've done it intentionally, but when you call a paedophile a sick bastard like that, you're suggesting that a rapist isn't one.

 

[blueincy]

It was stated in court.

The victim told police she had no memory of the incident and believed her drinks had been spiked.
So with that in mind, no consent was given or was it? If so why was Clayton cleared but Ched not?
If she had no memory of the incident how do the Jury know she didn't give consent?

It's clear to me This was two lads out on the piss having sex with one girl who by all indications agreed with it but woke the next morning feeling guilty. Maybe she couldn't look her boyfriend in the face after what she had done?
If it was Rape and she thought her drink was spiked why wasn't blood tests done to prove it?
Why was Clayton released without charge if she said she didn't remember the night? "RAPE IS ALL ABOUT CONSENT"

If you know so much about the case why weren't you at court?

How do you know i wasn't? What me being in court on the day has to do with anything is beyond me.

 

[dobobobo]

The victim told police she had no memory of the incident and believed her drinks had been spiked.
So with that in mind, no consent was given or was it? If so why was Clayton cleared but Ched not?
If she had no memory of the incident how do the Jury know she didn't give consent?

It's clear to me This was two lads out on the piss having sex with one girl who by all indications agreed with it but woke the next morning feeling guilty. Maybe she couldn't look her boyfriend in the face after what she had done?
If it was Rape and she thought her drink was spiked why wasn't blood tests done to prove it?
Why was Clayton released without charge if she said she didn't remember the night? "RAPE IS ALL ABOUT CONSENT"

If you know so much about the case why weren't you at court?

1) How do you know i wasn't? 2)What me being in court on the day has to do with anything is beyond me.

1) Probability.

2) That's where the case against and for the defendent was made.

 

[blueincy]

Would just like to interject,
Would you accept a child rapist, with a lot of people on here saying he's done his time so he should be allowed to ply his trade, would the same attitudes be applied if it was a child involved...

You are talking about a Pedophile a Nonce a sick bastard so your interjection is totally without substance.

Well not really, how can sex crimes be differentiated, rapist of whatever the age of the person are sick bastards, so by saying it is without substance are u saying it's ok to rape a 17yo but not a 14yo, rape is rape no matter what the age is, it's a horrible crime...

I thought you were taking it to another low depth with your Child rapist thing. The girl in question was 19 not 17 but yes you are right they are sick bastards what ever age of the Victim. My Bad.

 

[Tanzeylee]

You are talking about a Pedophile a Nonce a sick bastard so your interjection is totally without substance.

Well not really, how can sex crimes be differentiated, rapist of whatever the age of the person are sick bastards, so by saying it is without substance are u saying it's ok to rape a 17yo but not a 14yo, rape is rape no matter what the age is, it's a horrible crime...

I thought you were taking it to another low depth with your Child rapist thing. The girl in question was 19 not 17 but yes you are right they are sick bastards what ever age of the Victim. My Bad.

Nar just questioning some posters morals, some seem to think it's ok to have a rapist work in a high profile job just because they have served their time, I don't know the full circumstances of this particular case, so can't comment fully on it, but to say it's ok or so it appears, for someone to be seen as a role model, which as footballers they are, even after being convicted of rape is beyond me, which is why I put the child rape line in there, where do their moral indicators lie?would they say it's ok to be a footballer when convicted with one form of rape over another...