WSL Chelsea (H) 08/10/23:

Brilliant effort.

For those saying getting booked for dissent is stupid - it is, but we don't actually know what that dissent even was. It might have been 'aggressive walking'.

None of them seemed to be overly complaining, probably more asking what was going on, or maybe saying there was no need. Players have to be able to speak to refs, this one seemed to start booking players because they looked at her.

It was an embarrassing refereeing performance. Chelsea should be embarrassed at scraping a point considering how unbalanced the scales were.The WSL should be embarrassed that this ref is one of theirs.
 
Brilliant effort.

For those saying getting booked for dissent is stupid - it is, but we don't actually know what that dissent even was. It might have been 'aggressive walking'.

None of them seemed to be overly complaining, probably more asking what was going on, or maybe saying there was no need. Players have to be able to speak to refs, this one seemed to start booking players because they looked at her.

It was an embarrassing refereeing performance. Chelsea should be embarrassed at scraping a point considering how unbalanced the scales were.The WSL should be embarrassed that this ref is one of theirs.
Seems to me she made a rash decision, lost control of the game and instead of trying to diffuse the situation, she doubled down and booked anyone challenging her opinion.
 
A gutsy performance from the team to hold out for so long after going down to 10 and then 9 players. God only knows what that ref had been drinking / smoking before the game. We were dead on our feet at the end which isn't a surprise. Feel gutted for them conceding so late on.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.