Common sense should prevail. It’s not like she was time wastingIt's the rules, treated, go off for 30 seconds now.
Common sense should prevail. It’s not like she was time wastingIt's the rules, treated, go off for 30 seconds now.
They absolutely should. I was pleased Taylor avoided it though, as it wouldn't have helped.I'd write to FAWSL and tell them that that referee shouldn't be taking charge of a game anywhere and at any level, but I think I'd be wasting my time - I could get booked! I hope the club complain about her performance.
That's exactly why it was brought in, we don't know if it was genuine cramp or time wasting. If it was cramp then she shouldn't have requested treatment just after we gave away a corner.Common sense should prevail. It’s not like she was time wasting
They absolutely should. I was pleased Taylor avoided it though, as it wouldn't have helped.
I was interested in what Hayes said about it ? Sadly I can't find anything, but.....Yeah, I was glad he avoided it. If it were a male ref I'd be all for him going for it, but as it was it could have come across badly, as bullying even. Shouldn't be any different, but it could have seemed that way.
These are available from respected people on the bbc page.The changes have not gone down well so far as former England striker Ian Wright described Greenwood's dismissal as "embarrassing" and said it showed a lack of common sense.
Arsenal striker Beth Mead posted on X: "Awful decision, never time-wasting."
And former Manchester United manager Casey Stoney added: "Possibly the most ridiculous red card I've ever seen. How to ruin a game in the WSL. Absolute joke!!!!!"
It's questionable for sure, and there's definitely a bias towards the Ragettes and Chelsea...Is this the normal for women refereeing?
It's not doing it any favours.
It was ridiculous, I hope someone has a proper look at her performance.City 4 fouls
11 yellows
2 reds
Chelsea 10 fouls...