Xavi Simons

Man_City_Loyal said:
Is Isak better than Marmoush overall?

Last season Marmoush scored more goals, more assists etc.

Plus we'd not have Isak and Haaland at City
Click to expand...
In my opinion yes he is , nothing wrong in having strikers a club , we had Aguero, tevez and Dzeko ,didn't work out too bad did it
 
Nicholas van Whatsisface said:
No clear strategy, absolutely no financial responsibility, a purely reactive business model which means you change course every couple of months, an approach to the market that seems to boil down to chasing shiny things with no clear sense of purpose or direction, no understanding of or acknowledgement of the basic rules you’re required to operate within.

You genuinely seem to be suggesting we run the Club like we’re a child playing a computer game.
Click to expand...

To be fair it’s working for Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea, and might get the rags back into the top 10 this season. If we did it we might win the title back.
 
Nicholas van Whatsisface said:
Not sure you’ve properly grasped what sarcasm means mate, but you carry on!

We have squad restrictions which we're up against already, and buying yet more foreign players for astronomical fees when we can’t register the ones we’ve got already is not a sound strategy.

Neither is dropping over £250m on two players.

Forcing two players out who we’ve only just signed for over £100m in January would give us a horrendous reputation in the market for not having a clue what we’re doing.

The Club would have to be fucking stupid to make these moves.

You say football is a business, which of course is absolutely right - and what you’re suggesting is no way to run a business.

It’s what would happen if you appointed a four year old as your CEO.

No clear strategy, absolutely no financial responsibility, a purely reactive business model which means you change course every couple of months, an approach to the market that seems to boil down to chasing shiny things with no clear sense of purpose or direction, no understanding of or acknowledgement of the basic rules you’re required to operate within.

You genuinely seem to be suggesting we run the Club like we’re a child playing a computer game.

That’s not the real world - hence my comment.
Click to expand...
Arrogant
 
Semper aggressus said:
To be fair it’s working for Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea, and might get the rags back into the top 10 this season. If we did it we might win the title back.
Click to expand...

To be fair, none of the above three have spent over £250m on just two players in a single window.

Ever.

Or have proposed to create the spaces in their congested squads for these two signings by moving on two players they signed just six months previously, for over £100m.

If they did, they’d be a laughing stock.

And I refuse to take the Rags’ transfer ‘strategy’ remotely seriously as a model for any proper Club to aspire to.

I just can’t entertain their example in any serious minded conversation about how we might approach the market.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top