Quoted from the mirror story running on this,
"It's a [Spurs chairman] Daniel Levy deal. You know, it's his fingerprints all over it. It's the kind of thing we expected he was going to do".
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this libelous?!? It's up to the whiskey-nose if he wants it investigating (even though he's not one for dodgy transfer/loans is he? Not like his own son being manager of Preston and whiskey-nose loaning him loads of Utd youth players. Then said son turns out to be a shit manager (as expected), gets the sack, then the next day whiskey-nose takes all his players back from loan and also gets O'Neill (Not sure if it was him?) to do the same?
Granted the Fryers deal from the outside looks dodgy, but Pogba's was just as bad (if not worse).
"It's a [Spurs chairman] Daniel Levy deal. You know, it's his fingerprints all over it. It's the kind of thing we expected he was going to do".
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this libelous?!? It's up to the whiskey-nose if he wants it investigating (even though he's not one for dodgy transfer/loans is he? Not like his own son being manager of Preston and whiskey-nose loaning him loads of Utd youth players. Then said son turns out to be a shit manager (as expected), gets the sack, then the next day whiskey-nose takes all his players back from loan and also gets O'Neill (Not sure if it was him?) to do the same?
Granted the Fryers deal from the outside looks dodgy, but Pogba's was just as bad (if not worse).