It's Quiet - a new dawn

Status
Not open for further replies.
I see your point but the fact Pickford is probably on £30k per week and Joe £130k that makes a big difference to the transfer fees clubs are willing to pay.

If we are so desperate to get rid of him (due to the situation stated by some folks on here, that he has somehow blown it with the club), then we should come to some arrangement with Hart, to compensate for the wage difference.

If the situation has changed & the club is willing to start with a clean sheet, then he should shut his face moaning to the press every two days, get his head down & try to be a non shit goalkeeper again, learn to kick a fucking ball properly, & just see what happens.

One or the other has to happen. We can't have him sulking around the club whining about how nobody wants him. He either has to work hard as 3rd keeper, to try & be 2nd keeper, or if that's unacceptable to the club & him, go, even if it costs us money.
 
Just saw this on twitter this morning...doesnt look like many teams rate him highly enough to make a bid for him...


City Watch‏Verified account @City_Watch 6m6 minutes ago
City's 'two-tier' price for Joe Hart (top 6: £25m, rest: £20m) has attracted no offers and a West Ham loan bid has been rejected. [Mirror]
I remember last summer that many said he was too good for Torino and that a top club would have bought him but didn't have enough time as clubs get their keepers in early.

Doesn't seem to be happening early this summer anyway.
 
The word on Hart has been out for two or three seasons.

It seems only a large proportion of City fans couldn't accept he was in massive decline?

His wages aren't massive, these days, in the grander scheme of things.

England No.1, nobody beating a path to his door, others touting future loans.

His camp are now trying to peddle the myth that he is happy to stay and fight for his place, and won't be pushed out.

Simply calling our bluff and saving face?

Which is about the only thing he has saved in recent months.
 
The word on Hart has been out for two or three seasons.

It seems only a large proportion of City fans couldn't accept he was in massive decline?

His wages aren't massive, these days, in the grander scheme of things.

England No.1, nobody beating a path to his door, others touting future loans.

His camp are now trying to peddle the myth that he is happy to stay and fight for his place, and won't be pushed out.

Simply calling our bluff and saving face?

Which is about the only thing he has saved in recent months.

How long is left on his contract?
 
The word on Hart has been out for two or three seasons.

It seems only a large proportion of City fans couldn't accept he was in massive decline?

His wages aren't massive, these days, in the grander scheme of things.

England No.1, nobody beating a path to his door, others touting future loans.

His camp are now trying to peddle the myth that he is happy to stay and fight for his place, and won't be pushed out.

Simply calling our bluff and saving face?

Which is about the only thing he has saved in recent months.
Probably end up going on loan again, can't see City wanting him hanging around, not even making the bench
 
If we are so desperate to get rid of him (due to the situation stated by some folks on here, that he has somehow blown it with the club), then we should come to some arrangement with Hart, to compensate for the wage difference.

If the situation has changed & the club is willing to start with a clean sheet, then he should shut his face moaning to the press every two days, get his head down & try to be a non shit goalkeeper again, learn to kick a fucking ball properly, & just see what happens.

One or the other has to happen. We can't have him sulking around the club whining about how nobody wants him. He either has to work hard as 3rd keeper, to try & be 2nd keeper, or if that's unacceptable to the club & him, go, even if it costs us money.
Good to see someone put the emotional attachment to Joe to one side and spell out some harsh realities.
The club were right to move joe out last season and his error strewn performances at Torino have backed up this decision.When you add in his weak performance against Scotland his stock would struggle to be any lower.
The club should be prepared to take a hit and let him go for either a nominal fee or nothing at all to move him on and joes demands at any new club need to reflect his current standing( albeit international keeper somehow).
 
How long is left on his contract?

Ends season 2018-19.

So still couple of years left.

I suppose City hold leverage in the respect Joe will be desperate to go to the World Cup and has to be playing next season, so we couple bluff it out a good while longer, as clubs can't afford to leave it until the last minute to mess with a goalkeeper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.