BibbyBlue85
Well-Known Member
MCFC-alan88 said:
Unfortunately Milner is used sparingly and out wide too often by Mancini and i don't think this will change unfortunately because i really rate Milner as a central midfielder
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Charlie Adam/Scott Parker anyone?
- Thread starter King Of The Kippax
- Start date
Unfortunately Milner is used sparingly and out wide too often by Mancini and i don't think this will change unfortunately because i really rate Milner as a central midfielder
AustinBlue
Well-Known Member
MCFC-alan88 said:BibbyBlue85 said:No to Adam but a big yes to Parker.
Would offer us a bigger driving force instead of Barry. Sometimes we are too slow getting through midfield and Parker would solve this imo
Milner.
This
BibbyBlue85 said:MCFC-alan88 said:BibbyBlue85 said:No to Adam but a big yes to Parker.
Would offer us a bigger driving force instead of Barry. Sometimes we are too slow getting through midfield and Parker would solve this imo
Milner.
Unfortunately Milner is used sparingly and out wide too often by Mancini and i don't think this will change unfortunately because i really rate Milner as a central midfielder
Mancini is using Milner as an industrious midfielder, filling in whenever needed. But I believe if Milner does break into the first team, he would be used centrally.
And Milner > Adam/Parker anytime.
BibbyBlue85
Well-Known Member
Young said:BibbyBlue85 said:MCFC-alan88 said:Milner.
Unfortunately Milner is used sparingly and out wide too often by Mancini and i don't think this will change unfortunately because i really rate Milner as a central midfielder
Mancini is using Milner as an industrious midfielder, filling in whenever needed. But I believe if Milner does break into the first team, he would be used centrally.
And Milner > Adam/Parker anytime.
I agree that Milner is better than both Adam and Parker and want Milner to force his way in to the starting 11 centrally. I was going off Mancini's previous record of how he has used Milner for the majority of the season
Paul Lake's Left Knee
Well-Known Member
I agree that Adam is over rated... i preferred the look of Vaughan (who is on a free i think) in that midfield - he looked a tidy little player and seemed to do all the bits Adam was incapable of, consistancy, leg work and tackling.
Parker is alright but might be expensive in wages etc just for cover, he needs to play every week and will want to at his age esp after what happened at Chelsea, also it was very easy to look good in that Wet Sham of a team. He isnt that much better than what we have and i would rather us bring in quality than just a body incase of injuries...
Parker is alright but might be expensive in wages etc just for cover, he needs to play every week and will want to at his age esp after what happened at Chelsea, also it was very easy to look good in that Wet Sham of a team. He isnt that much better than what we have and i would rather us bring in quality than just a body incase of injuries...
SalfordCityBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2008
- Messages
- 2,474
The Fat el Hombre said:If we're signing gary cahill we might as well fill the squad with average no marks.
Cahill will be one of those players that, should we sign him, everyone will more than likely be denying comments like this were ever made. Good player in a poor/average side, could really shine with us under Mancini and co. Sounds like the price is right too, if the Nedum and Boyata stories included are true.
Adam would be a definite no were it up to me. Parker would be a no too, although less enthusiastically. Parker's a very good player, but a step down IMO from what we should be looking at this summer.
Stiz
Well-Known Member
id say 'none'. Both good players... but arent we looking for great players?
SalfordCityBlue said:The Fat el Hombre said:If we're signing gary cahill we might as well fill the squad with average no marks.
Cahill will be one of those players that, should we sign him, everyone will more than likely be denying comments like this were ever made. Good player in a poor/average side, could really shine with us under Mancini and co. Sounds like the price is right too, if the Nedum and Boyata stories included are true.
Adam would be a definite no were it up to me. Parker would be a no too, although less enthusiastically. Parker's a very good player, but a step down IMO from what we should be looking at this summer.
Adam, Cahill & Parker are players that remind me very much of SWP. Look fantastic at very average clubs but the moment you move thm onto somewhere bigger they're completely out of their depth. I.E SWP from us to Chelsea under Pearce (for those that didn't understand)
nevilletogoater-in said:SalfordCityBlue said:The Fat el Hombre said:If we're signing gary cahill we might as well fill the squad with average no marks.
Cahill will be one of those players that, should we sign him, everyone will more than likely be denying comments like this were ever made. Good player in a poor/average side, could really shine with us under Mancini and co. Sounds like the price is right too, if the Nedum and Boyata stories included are true.
Adam would be a definite no were it up to me. Parker would be a no too, although less enthusiastically. Parker's a very good player, but a step down IMO from what we should be looking at this summer.
Adam, Cahill & Parker are players that remind me very much of SWP. Look fantastic at very average clubs but the moment you move thm onto somewhere bigger they're completely out of their depth. I.E SWP from us to Chelsea under Pearce (for those that didn't understand)
But swp was a great talent and just lost his confidence at Chelsea as he played hardly any games. He wasnt prepared mentally to be a normal fish in the big pond, and he shit his pants.
Parker played how many times for Chelsea?
Adam hasn't played at a big club. Don't say Rangers.