Chelsea Away Tickets

badge said:
bluesmith said:
badge said:
and yeah, this guy must be as daft as me. fancy thinking city would return tickets!

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.buzzyfootball.com/new/mculFf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.buzzyfootball.com/new/mculFf</a>
Did you just quote a random guy of twitter to substantiate a ridiculous point. Think it through - city were turning down people trying to buy tickets at £200+ for the boat trip yet you think they did that and then sent tickets back to Chelsea? You are wrong, just like you were wrong about the southampton game.

<a class="postlink" href="https://mcfc.co.uk/news/tickets-and-travel/2014/november/southampton-v-city-sold-out" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">https://mcfc.co.uk/news/tickets-and-tra ... y-sold-out</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/26/ticket-touts-take-tactics-to-new-levels-ahead-of-chelsea-v-manchester-city-5035691" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/26/ticket-to ... ty-5035691</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2014/07/ticket-e.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... ket-e.html</a>

i'm making the point that it's not unreasonable to assume it was city that returned the tickets. nothing ridiculous about it at all. have you ever heard of any fan returning tickets to the club? who the fuck would return tickets for one of the biggest matches of the season? chelsea also have their own ticket exchange scheme, negating the need for fans to return them to the club. and i wasn't wrong about the southampton game either. you will note that the ticket information for that game includes one very telling word: initial. so why, when those tickets were sold out SEVENTEEN DAYS BEFORE the game, did we not request the extra allocation when it must have been apparent that we could have sold another seven hundred?
i accept there is a slim chance i could be wrong, but the fact that you seem so incapable of grasping the fact that the most logical explanation for returned tickets is usually the visiting club, baffles me.

With City nor Chelsea saying tickets have been returned by city why assume they were without one shred of evidence?

If they were and we only took the sale or return allocation of 1,500, we would not have returned them and Chelsea would have sold them from day one.

Southampton has always been a low demand game for CIty fans due to distance and the extra allocation has to be requested 6 weeks in advance not 17 days (unless the home club never sells out were they may give the away club more favourable terms but it isn't the case with Chelsea).

City used to sell corporate seats the middle of the east stand at the back on the day of the game at normal prices if they couldn't sell the accompanying hospitality packages, and the Chelsea ticket exchange is just for season ticket holders.

Next time someone winds you up try and think about it.
 
badge said:
bluesmith said:
badge said:
and yeah, this guy must be as daft as me. fancy thinking city would return tickets!

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.buzzyfootball.com/new/mculFf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.buzzyfootball.com/new/mculFf</a>
Did you just quote a random guy of twitter to substantiate a ridiculous point. Think it through - city were turning down people trying to buy tickets at £200+ for the boat trip yet you think they did that and then sent tickets back to Chelsea? You are wrong, just like you were wrong about the southampton game.

<a class="postlink" href="https://mcfc.co.uk/news/tickets-and-travel/2014/november/southampton-v-city-sold-out" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">https://mcfc.co.uk/news/tickets-and-tra ... y-sold-out</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/26/ticket-touts-take-tactics-to-new-levels-ahead-of-chelsea-v-manchester-city-5035691" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/26/ticket-to ... ty-5035691</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2014/07/ticket-e.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... ket-e.html</a>

i'm making the point that it's not unreasonable to assume it was city that returned the tickets. nothing ridiculous about it at all. have you ever heard of any fan returning tickets to the club? who the fuck would return tickets for one of the biggest matches of the season? chelsea also have their own ticket exchange scheme, negating the need for fans to return them to the club. and i wasn't wrong about the southampton game either. you will note that the ticket information for that game includes one very telling word: initial. so why, when those tickets were sold out SEVENTEEN DAYS BEFORE the game, did we not request the extra allocation when it must have been apparent that we could have sold another seven hundred?
i accept there is a slim chance i could be wrong, but the fact that you seem so incapable of grasping the fact that the most logical explanation for returned tickets is usually the visiting club, baffles me.

You were wrong about Southampton - You said we returned tickets when we clearly didnt. No idea why we didnt request extra but that wasnt your point.

City announced we had 3000 tickets for Chelsea, thats the max we could have taken. We announced we sold out. We will have 3000 fans there. We have returned no tickets.

United release tickets all the time in the lead up to matches, they are tickets from hospitality that hasnt sold out and are generally in the quadrants.

Do you reckon liverpool didnt sell out last night too? <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2015/01/liverpool-tickets-back-on-sale-now.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... e-now.html</a>
Do you think Spurs didnt sell out? - <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2014/11/extra-tottenham-and-sporting-tickets-on-sale-tomorrow.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... orrow.html</a>
Newcastle must be struggling too - <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2015/01/newcastle-tickets-back-on-sale-to-members.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... mbers.html</a>
What about Arsenal? - <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2014/10/arsenal-tickets-on-sale-to-members.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... mbers.html</a>
QPR too? - <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2014/10/extra-qpr-tickets-available-to-members.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... mbers.html</a>

You are wrong!
 
I'm sorted, but a mate of mine not yet. I know it would something like a miracle, but I have to ask. Has Anyone a ticket for Saturday. Can meet in London from Friday eve till kickoff. Cheers
 
Im still after 1 ticket for this game....

I have 13000 points but missed the sale date as I was away with work last week.

I am not going to Old Trafford due to being on a stag do in Portugal that weekend of the 11th April.

I would be able to sell the United ticket in exchange for a Chelsea one.

If anybody can help me out that would be great.


Cheers
 
bluesmith said:
badge said:
bluesmith said:
Did you just quote a random guy of twitter to substantiate a ridiculous point. Think it through - city were turning down people trying to buy tickets at £200+ for the boat trip yet you think they did that and then sent tickets back to Chelsea? You are wrong, just like you were wrong about the southampton game.

<a class="postlink" href="https://mcfc.co.uk/news/tickets-and-travel/2014/november/southampton-v-city-sold-out" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">https://mcfc.co.uk/news/tickets-and-tra ... y-sold-out</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/26/ticket-touts-take-tactics-to-new-levels-ahead-of-chelsea-v-manchester-city-5035691" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/26/ticket-to ... ty-5035691</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2014/07/ticket-e.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... ket-e.html</a>

i'm making the point that it's not unreasonable to assume it was city that returned the tickets. nothing ridiculous about it at all. have you ever heard of any fan returning tickets to the club? who the fuck would return tickets for one of the biggest matches of the season? chelsea also have their own ticket exchange scheme, negating the need for fans to return them to the club. and i wasn't wrong about the southampton game either. you will note that the ticket information for that game includes one very telling word: initial. so why, when those tickets were sold out SEVENTEEN DAYS BEFORE the game, did we not request the extra allocation when it must have been apparent that we could have sold another seven hundred?
i accept there is a slim chance i could be wrong, but the fact that you seem so incapable of grasping the fact that the most logical explanation for returned tickets is usually the visiting club, baffles me.

You were wrong about Southampton - You said we returned tickets when we clearly didnt. No idea why we didnt request extra but that wasnt your point.

City announced we had 3000 tickets for Chelsea, thats the max we could have taken. We announced we sold out. We will have 3000 fans there. We have returned no tickets.

United release tickets all the time in the lead up to matches, they are tickets from hospitality that hasnt sold out and are generally in the quadrants.

Do you reckon liverpool didnt sell out last night too? <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2015/01/liverpool-tickets-back-on-sale-now.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... e-now.html</a>
Do you think Spurs didnt sell out? - <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2014/11/extra-tottenham-and-sporting-tickets-on-sale-tomorrow.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... orrow.html</a>
Newcastle must be struggling too - <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2015/01/newcastle-tickets-back-on-sale-to-members.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... mbers.html</a>
What about Arsenal? - <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2014/10/arsenal-tickets-on-sale-to-members.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... mbers.html</a>
QPR too? - <a class="postlink" href="http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-news/2014/10/extra-qpr-tickets-available-to-members.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chelseafc.com/news/latest-ne ... mbers.html</a>

You are wrong!

it looks like i am wrong after all. i am a prize dick. i apologise.
 
Need one ticket done every premier league home/away last four seasons .. None missed ... Last shout before I have to opt for Chelsea end ... Loads the same as me I know ... Will pay good money face value cheers ... Paul
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.