The feelig is that we're having a pretty poor season after a lot of talk about regaining the title making real progress in Europe and those first five games when we looked in a different league to the rest of the PL. Is it Pellers? Is it the team? Is it the injuries? Is it a bit of everything? Or a bit of everything and a bit more besides? I haven't a clue, but I was interested to come across the following in Balague's Pep Guardiola: Another Way of Winning. It describes the things which had convinced Pep that a parting of the ways with the club were in his and its best interests. Some of what he describes may seem eerily similar to City not only this season, but also in 2012-13:-
"Pep recognised the symptoms: not competing well has nothing to do with playing well or badly, it is about looking after the little details. Barcelona forgot that they needed to be Barcelona in every minute of the match; yet often they weren't effective enough when it was required, conceding sloppy goals because of lack of concentration, making the transition between attack and defence too slowly, or simply starting games a little too relaxed and then reacting too late. Such attitudes and errors, to name just a few, cost points and titles. Barcelona also failed to change their style even when the conditions (pitch, weather) were against them. Is flexibility in terms of a team's primary style a sign of weakness or of strength? Isn't adapting a virtue?"
I think we see all these features in City's play recently. A rugby pundit put it rather differently before last Saturday's match with Scotland by saying that under Stuart Lancaster England was packed with 99 percenters (players and staff who give 99% of their all, not intentionally, but that the one percent extra makes the difference between being also-rans and world champions. With the links with Pep dating back well before the new season, but reaching fever pitch lately, is this not the problem with City; the manager and players have slipped into 99%ism.