Mr Bates vs the Post Office

mosssideblue said:
Proof that PO were lying in court, costing taxpayer over £100m has been released.

Several need to be jailed over this
Click to expand...
We can only hope that happens but I, sadly, see the ones at the top being looked after.
Maybe a few investigators will do time to appease the masses but not the top players.
 
Blue Mist said:
We can only hope that happens but I, sadly, see the ones at the top being looked after.
Maybe a few investigators will do time to appease the masses but not the top players.
Click to expand...
Will be interesting what Starmer will do as no doubt he will be PM by the time the Inquiry wraps up. Public anger will be off the scale
 
mosssideblue said:
Will be interesting what Starmer will do as no doubt he will be PM by the time the Inquiry wraps up. Public anger will be off the scale
Click to expand...
Whilst the name of his party is different to the current lot, I don't see much difference. Those up there will look after those up there. It will start off with investigations by the Met, the PO investigators will be charged (after many months) a few legal people will be arrested and then 4 years on, we will have a few token convictions.

A decent system/political party would have already ensured all postmasters would have been fully compensated now. Mind you, neither Tory nor Labour have compensated the blood victims and their families which us an even older scandal.
 
Blue Mist said:
I'm sorry, I'm confused, what has Paula Vennels done so wrong that the King has to step in ?
Has she heen found guilty by a court of law ?
Do not get me wrong, she is a despicable women but all this is, is just a baying mob whipped up by a media who have no morals.
Get a police investigation done, get her in the Crown Court and if/when found guilty, strip her of the award. British justice is based on evidence presented to a court, not all this pseudo trial by MP's and Daily Telegraph readers.
Click to expand...
She wasn't stripped of her CBE because of wrongdoing, she was stripped of it because she didn't do anything to deserve it.
It was awarded to her for "services to Post Office". She worked for the organisation from 2007-2019 and between 2012 and 2019 was it's CEO. I don't really think being involved in an organisation that was responsible for the wrongful prosecution of over 900 people is worthy of a CBE.
What she knew when is yet to be established, but even if it turns out she knew nothing she was it's head for the 7 years the biggest part of the cover up occurred. If she didn't know she should have IMO if you don't agree with that you should at least agree she shouldn't have been awarded a CBE for not knowing?
Beyond that her award was primarily for transforming POL into a profit making organisation, some of that profit came from sub-postmasters repaying money to POL that was never missing in the first place. When you deduct the £1bn set aside to compensate sub postmasters I think it's safe to assume there was no profit!
 
Last edited:
Blue Mist said:
We can only hope that happens but I, sadly, see the ones at the top being looked after.
Maybe a few investigators will do time to appease the masses but not the top players.
Click to expand...
Lawyers and those that gave evidence in court are the most likely to serve time as it's quite easy to prove "perverting the course of justice". I expect that will include General Counsel Susan Crichton that is only one step away from Vennels so you never know......
 
What hapened to the thousand of pounds (millions?) coughed up by sub-post office owners out of their own savings to cover up the erroneous loses?

Whoever was auditing the Post Office headquarters accounts was not doing a very good job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.