Thats an interesting point, no media outlet has managed to get a single legal or finance representative to come on and say why city will be found guilty and what the weight of evidence against city is and how they will be found guilty because of that weight of evidence.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Dirty Harry
Well-Known Member
There was er, Nick Harris …………Thats an interesting point, no media outlet has managed to get a single legal or finance representative to come on and say why city will be found guilty and what the weight of evidence against city is and how they will be found guilty because of that weight of evidence.
I’d say the opposite, every media outlet has tens of self proclaimed legal and financial representatives, which are always on/writing reams of stuff, that say City are guilty, without bothering to weigh up any evidence or say what we are alledgedly guilty of.Thats an interesting point, no media outlet has managed to get a single legal or finance representative to come on and say why city will be found guilty and what the weight of evidence against city is and how they will be found guilty because of that weight of evidence.
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
I suppose RE talksh Mr Jordan has put himself forward as legally competent so he may resist a proper legal / finance expert.Thats an interesting point, no media outlet has managed to get a single legal or finance representative to come on and say why city will be found guilty and what the weight of evidence against city is and how they will be found guilty because of that weight of evidence.
The other reason is that a real expert is likely to agree with Stefan. Where's the reward for confrontation in that?
Last edited:
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 8,585
There was er, Nick Harris …………
& Talksport did get Peter Moore the Dipper exec who was errr very diplomatic according to Jim White.
Evidence? What evidence?Thats an interesting point, no media outlet has managed to get a single legal or finance representative to come on and say why city will be found guilty and what the weight of evidence against city is and how they will be found guilty because of that weight of evidence.
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 14,899
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I thought that was the general feeling amongst City fans tbf.What if the actual game here (once again spearheaded by certain clubs) is to not actually get any of these charges to stick - because they know they shouldnt - but to just cause as much damage and make it seem that once cleared peoples minds will believe that City got off a technicallity and will be labelled cheats
Large scale reputational damage
This is why i hope we will not accept any charge, even a non-copperation charge
Its exactly from the uefa playback.
They made a utube doc with a false company name producing it with our greatest fans such as Panja,Tebas and Harris adding their two penneth.They also a Piers Morgan show with no new evidence and London journo Lawton and ex Arsenal chair Dein on the panel.Thats an interesting point, no media outlet has managed to get a single legal or finance representative to come on and say why city will be found guilty and what the weight of evidence against city is and how they will be found guilty because of that weight of evidence.
To Morgans clear disappointment even David Dein suggested there was no clear incriminating evidence.
Don't think it's a coincidence we've seen nothing of late.
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
I think they felt at the time of the so called charges that City were at a low ebb both on the field and off so City were likely to fall apart completely and. look for a settlement because of the charges.I thought that was the general feeling amongst City fans tbf.
Its exactly from the uefa playback.
Unfortunately it had the reverse effect producing a treble season and a massive financial blow to the red shirts.
Stockton Heath Blue
Well-Known Member
They do understand @CC1 , they just choose to ignore the point as it doesn't fit their narrative..That’s what the general media don’t understand. It’s not up to us to lead the case - it’s up to the PL to provide proof of guilt & it has to be substantial proof.
why do they keep suggesting that we should not be dragging out the issue when the time it’s taking is because the PL “ evidence” is not forthcoming