For pleasantly plump, read fat bastard. (Sorry, couldn't resist)
You're not sorry at all...haha!!!!!.
For pleasantly plump, read fat bastard. (Sorry, couldn't resist)
They now, apparently, have a big club sponsor.Puma, seriously what a bad choice. They make average kits and don't have the presence of a big club sponsor. Wish it would've have been Adidas. Rather keep Nike then.
Based on what criteria ????????????????I think puma are absolutely wank to be honest
Puma, seriously what a bad choice. They make average kits and don't have the presence of a big club sponsor. Wish it would've have been Adidas. Rather keep Nike then.
Adidas have their share of the Premier League covered with United and Chelsea, and with those two alone we would be well down their pecking order of interest.
I always thought we would be going for a brand that would be looking to put us near the top of their interests and treat us as one of their signature clubs, and if Puma is the choice only Arsenal would be ahead of us.
Adidas can't offer us that. Not with United, Chelsea, Juventus, Real Madrid and Bayern on their roster. Those clubs will just simply be branded more than us.
What do the club want? Nice kits, or more exposure?
Nike are surprisingly only going to be left with Barcelona, Atletico Madrid and Paris from the big currently renowned clubs if we move on next year.
The skin tight fit looks awful.
As a pleasantly plump kind of guy, these comments have got me seriously worried.
Apparently Arsenal are moving to Adidas as well, which means Puma will go above and beyond for us. We also have their most marketable player (Aguero).
I'm only talking about the players kit. I think it looks bad on them.The skin tight fit will only be for the players and the fans that prefer it that way.
Nike offered both styles this year and I'm sure Puma will do the same as they know the majority of their shirt sales will be non skin-tight.