Skashion said:We should be happy they're playing because they're playing at Wembley versus not playing at all? I don't see the point of exposing them to the risk of injury in a meaningless match when it's the clubs who pay the transfer fees and wages. If international break means a week's rest and returning uninjured that's what I'll take.BoyBlue_1985 said:I wasnt arguing that. My point was people just mindlessly blame the FA for the international fixture list when it has jack all to do with them what dates the international breaks are on. People with players in the team should be happy we play most of our friendlies at Wembley as it saves sending players half way round the world and coming back knackered
Good point. And all qualifying games are shite and not worth watching. God only knows why people go to watch some of them.gaudinho's stolen car said:I am only interested in International Football when it fills the gap between the end of one season and the start of another.
What drives me potty is the fact that we miss 2 weeks of football during crucial parts of the season to send our best players off to be potentially injured, and then because of fixture congestion we have to play 3 games a week for months on end. Aaaaaaaargh!
des hardi said:it s horrible when your team is average..... not playing well....and relying on robbie "the dogshit" keane..... he should have retired 3 years ago!!!!! ffs