It comes to something when a team in the championship also play the reserves because of a league game.
Who doesn't agree with me?
You'll be hard pressed to find any highlights mate.Just finished working so didn't get to see any of the match. Were we utter gash or unlucky? Wondered whether we had one of those days when we just didn't look like scoring? Is it worth watching the highlights at all???
Dont worry, I think he will be limited to cup games.Kev looked off the pace when he came on, that was the worse game I have seen Navas play, and Bravo is on par with my mum as a keeper.
But we are still in the hat, that game had banana skin wrote all over it ( Not least because of the Altringcham ref ) so I will take a replay at our place as a good result for how we played.
Barely is a matter of opinion. We had far more possession and the better chances in the game. Bravo had to make a couple of saves but they were hardly difficult saves and he was never exposed in the way he has been far too often in the EPL.
Huddersfield worked very hard and tried hard not to let City settle, which worked to a degree.
City lacked creativity and style etc and we all know why but going back to the original post I commented on, they were not more than a match for us and such statements are typical of the crass overreactions this site sees when we don't convincingly batter our opponents.
You'll have to sever his umbilical chord then! ;0)Jesus will save us.
That bad hey?You'll be hard pressed to find any highlights mate.
for these game we need a better balance of young players and the first team. delph, fernando, navas aren't good enough for us, so why not play some young players and first teamers.
Barely is a matter of opinion. We had far more possession and the better chances in the game. Bravo had to make a couple of saves but they were hardly difficult saves and he was never exposed in the way he has been far too often in the EPL.
Huddersfield worked very hard and tried hard not to let City settle, which worked to a degree.
City lacked creativity and style etc and we all know why but going back to the original post I commented on, they were not more than a match for us and such statements are typical of the crass overreactions this site sees when we don't convincingly batter our opponents.
He played more like Tevez today. Thought we should've put Nacho on near the end, because Aguero was doing fine as an attacking mid, but we needed a striker in the box. Nacho would've been most likely to get on the end of Navas' one good cross (which was one more than Sane, by the way...).
Why are you digging Bravo out you crank? He did fuck all wrong today.
Unless you're mum is ace in net, then I apologise.
Me for a start and most likely lots of others, including the poster you quoted.
You have your opinion and some will disagree with it.
That doesn't entitle you to start claiming the forum is shit blah blah blah and smacks of a certain irony dont you think?
You can't dispute that they were a match for us and in my opinion, i think they were more than a match for us. When it got to around the 80th minute and we were meandering through the last ten minutes, it wouldn't have come as a surprise to anyone if they would have scored.
And putting it into context, this was their second string
can i add a :) before you apply for the
just about everyone :)
Nah. Think I'll stick to my original comment.The offside "Goal" was quite a pathetic attempt as was the cross he flapped at (And missed) that Sagna had to put out for a corner, he had virtually f*ck all to do and could still have lost us the game, and dont give me the shite that you were anywhere near confident whenever a high ball came in.
It was one of Benny Hill's lesser works.That bad hey?