Not if Aguero's "shot" was on target.Which makes it an own goal.
Not if Aguero's "shot" was on target.Which makes it an own goal.
Which makes it an own goal.
I'd like to agree but on current form, I very much doubt itAguero will score 20+ goals in the remaining season. Starting from tomorrow. You will see. He is still the best striker in the world.
I'd like to agree but on current form, I very much doubt it
If I am wrong, and Aguero doesn t score a double tonight, than I will have to agree that I ve been watching City for 10 years for nothing. This is the kind of game when the team increases the level.I'd like to agree but on current form, I very much doubt it
If I am wrong, and Aguero doesn t score a double tonight, than I will have to agree that I ve been watching City for 10 years for nothing. This is the kind of game when the team increases the level.
I trust this team.Bit OTT that mate
Dubious.
Not if Aguero's "shot" was on target.
What is....the fact Aguero had a "shot" or the point being made. I don't make the rules...if the shot was on target then even though it is deflected it counts as a goal. An OG is if the shot was not on target and is deflected in.That is absolute bullshit.
What is....the fact Aguero had a "shot" or the point being made. I don't make the rules...if the shot was on target then even though it is deflected it counts as a goal. An OG is if the shot was not on target and is deflected in.
Nope still wrong.
"In association football, an own goal occurs when a player causes the ball to go into his or her own team's goal, resulting in a goal being scored for the opposition.
The fact that the defending player touches the ball last does not automatically mean that the goal is recorded as an own goal. Only if the ball would not have gone past the goal-line but for the defending player would an own goal be credited."
You cannot say definitively the ball would have gone in if the defender had not touched it. The Keeper "could" have saved it. Thus it is not an example of a global conspiracy to call it an own goal. It was a judgement call and the call was made. To suggest that it is a nefarious plot by the media is silly.
Benched
It isThis is a massive gamble and a big fuckoff to Sergio if true.
Hummm? Not sure about this, if that were the case, then every ball that hits a defending player, that subsequently crosses the line would be an own goal, because, in your words...
"The Keeper "could" have saved it."
I would say only if the keeper is actually in a position to save it which he was on the weekend.
The larger point that I am trying to make is WHO CARES? It was a goal. We won. Own goals are always debateable, but to immediately say that if we are awarded an own goal it is because of some conspiracy against City is pathetic and the fans need to get past this small club thinking.
Source? and don't say twitterBenched