The perfect fumble
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 26,051
Why is it patronising to say that the opinion that happens to be the one that you agree with is the only one based on facts and logic and the opposition is entirely emotional?
Is that a real question?
Then refutation would blow my argument out of the water, but where is it? All I get is an emotional response.