hampshireblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 3,013
Swarbrick strikes again
Swarbrick strikes again
And nor should they have been. Just not a penalty.Not a chance City would have been given that decision!
He guessed, just like the liner at Wembley, disgraceful, if they don't actually see it they shouldn't give it. We feel bad about it imagine how the Swan's fans feel, think they need to get in the box and dive and hopefully then Swarbrick get chance to even it up.Not a chance City would have been given that decision!
I dont keep up with what these ****s have previously given,so what else has he done?Swarbrick strikes again
I dont keep up with what these ****s have previously given,so what else has he done?
CheersSane v Forster 2 weeks ago.
I'm sick of it. The bad officiating this season has reached an all time high.
I seriously think up and down the country there need to be mass walk out when 100% nailed on decisions are gotten wrong.
The only problem is conveying that information to the fans. From the stands you can't always be 100%.
Im so close to being though with football due to what can only be corruption.
Maybe the press will finally start reporting on it when stadiums empty.
I think we should start more threads discussing officiating on the forum
Sane v Forster 2 weeks ago.
The decision we got today, is about 30th in line compared to decisions we should have had.
And who is against? Fucking Boro.
So much of the stuff which we should have had & didn't get, was against top 6 teams.
Says it all about this fucking league.
Yeah, we tried this and got stiffed for failing to control our players.Easy be much more public about the poor decisions we get. Our captain needs to be in the refs ear. Make sure every ref knows by our reaction when we are fouled.
Other than that hope for some fair officiating, so I'd go with the former.