1.618034
Well-Known Member
It's a Tory version of a "Labour type policy" which demonstrates their/her complete and utter lack of decency, understanding or fairness.Look at the sentence - a labour type policy -
I never said it was their social care policy past or present. It is a policy that would hit the richest hardest. That is more a labour type policy. If you think that is not the case fair enough. You state the policy is unfair which was my immediate reaction so what is labours fairer policy on social care
I'm not missing anything we are talking about social care and you posted about several rich people and the gap between rich and poor in general. So how does this policy help the rich? What fair policy do you have?
If you'd read my previous reply, which you replied to, you'd have seen what I think is fair.
"If the richest individuals and companies paid a little more, or in some cases, some tax then we could solve the problem for everyone, fairly."
I'm not talking about those who have houses/estates worth, say half a million or less, these aren't the richest by any real means, but they are the ones who will suffer the most under this poorly thought out idea...
I've nothing against giving people aspirations, but this policy completely goes against that and punishes those who've not got quite enough to be really wealthy.
On that note, it's goodnight from me as this is seemingly falling on deaf ears and, at this hour and after this number of beers, I've no intention of doing the maths for you.
Socialists are not against wealth and it's creation...