Hamann Pineapple
Well-Known Member
But surely if those businesses you sell to benefit then you would see increased business from them.Not really mate. I am purely business to business.
But surely if those businesses you sell to benefit then you would see increased business from them.Not really mate. I am purely business to business.
I thought they made a mistake in trying to oust Corbyn, especially so soon after he became leader. But it would have been much worse if the senior posts in the shadow cabinet were occupied by people who fundamentally disagreed with their leader's policies.
I think the the current understanding where the moderates are maintaining a low profile is probably the best Labour could hope for. The election is being fought on the left's terms, its their manifesto. If Corbyn does reasonably well (increases Labour's share of the vote and keeps the tory majority below say 25 seats) he would be entitled to stay in the job, the moderates would be the ones with the decision to make. If the majority is over 100 the moderates could claim that the experiment has spectacularly failed.
At the moment I think Labour are heading for the worst possible outcome. A defeat that isn't bad enough for Corbyn to lose the leadership, but not good enough for the left to claim some sort of vindication.
Did Corbyn not say yesterday small businesses would be subsidised in some way to accommodate these wage increases or am I imagining it ?
Cheesy said:http://press.labour.org.uk/post/115103489714/labour-will-prioritise-tax-cuts-for-small-firms
http://www.newstatesman.com/politic...-election-manifesto-winners-and-losers-glance
http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/16/labou...y-policies-for-general-election-2017-6628153/
https://www.tax.org.uk/media-centre...on-2017-corporation-tax-and-income-tax-higher
Maybe you have been too busy reading the right wing propaganda to study the facts and missed this part of the fully costed Labour Manifesto
You've proper fucked up here!
First link is to a policy announcement by Ed Balls :-D Apprently he's the Shadow Chancellor although (and again, I may have missed something here) I thought that nowadays he was a ballroom dancer.
Then you show a complete lack of understanding of the subject. Labour plan to reintroduce a small profits corporation tax rate. Which is nice. However, this will be set at 20% rising to 21% in 2020-21 which is higher than they pay now & is a damn sight higher than under Tory plans.
Take a look at this from the IFS...
Maybe you have been too busy reading The Guardian and The Socialist Worker to study the facts and you've missed the fact that the Labour Manifesto is nowhere near fully costed.
That is a very one sided view of things, which is understandable considering your position. I have no idea what your business is, but would it not benefit from the extra cash that millions of people would have?
Not really mate. I am purely business to business.
What extra cash? Moving money from one pot to another pot, does not mean more money.
But surely if those businesses you sell to benefit then you would see increased business from them.
You don't think people who have had a £2.50 per hour increase will have more cash?
I think the Conservatives will get 375+ seats and Labour will get around 200. May will have a 70+ majority which, given her complete lack of conviction on anything, is an astonishing state for British politics to be in. As for Jezza, I'm not wholly convinced he is as unelectable as is often suggested. He seems to be, more or less, a man of his word, who sticks to his beliefs (that seems to be portrayed as a bad thing), whilst May changes her mind more often than her pants! Where he has dropped a catastrophic bollock is having John McDonnell and Diane Abbott anywhere near the shadow cabinet.I thought they made a mistake in trying to oust Corbyn, especially so soon after he became leader. But it would have been much worse if the senior posts in the shadow cabinet were occupied by people who fundamentally disagreed with their leader's policies.
I think the the current understanding where the moderates are maintaining a low profile is probably the best Labour could hope for. The election is being fought on the left's terms, its their manifesto. If Corbyn does reasonably well (increases Labour's share of the vote and keeps the tory majority below say 25 seats) he would be entitled to stay in the job, the moderates would be the ones with the decision to make. If the majority is over 100 the moderates could claim that the experiment has spectacularly failed.
At the moment I think Labour are heading for the worst possible outcome. A defeat that isn't bad enough for Corbyn to lose the leadership, but not good enough for the left to claim some sort of vindication.
As he got elected three times, it doesn't say much for the views of the public. Mind you, George and 'Call me Dave' said we were all in it together......I have said many times I am not into politics, but have opinions. Now correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Jeremy Corbyn the true face of the Labour Party and not a charlatan like Blair, lying to the public just to get elected?
Correct, and led us into an illegal war in between those elections.As he got elected three times, it doesn't say much for the views of the public. Mind you, George and 'Call me Dave' said we were all in it together......
Funny, I got my definition from the Cambridge dictionary, under "Communism" ;-)
I know perfectly well what communism is, and I fully understand that committment to clause 4 does not in itself mean communism. But it shows where someone's head is at and there's plenty of evidence that he is further left than it would at first appear. His views on Russia, for example. His appointing Andrew Murray - a former leading member of the communist party and supporter of Russia, someone who's expressed "solidarity" with North Korea. And Corbyn wants him in his team. I can go on...
You don't think people who have had a £2.50 per hour increase will have more cash?
Have you ever considered Norway to be a communist state?
I have said many times I am not into politics, but have opinions. Now correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Jeremy Corbyn the true face of the Labour Party and not a charlatan like Blair, lying to the public just to get elected?
And yet he won again. Just for information but, 153 Labour MPs did not vote for that war, compared to 19 Conservatives. 58% of the country were in favour, although 90% now say they weren't!Correct, and led us into an illegal war in between those elections.
:DI've never considered Norway, full stop.
At least you can't accuse May of lying. She's pro Brexit, pro remain, against the nasty party, for slashing benefits, pro tax cuts, wants NI rises, pro paying for social care, against paying for social care. A politician who flip-flops more than this woman I have not seen..Who says Corbyn isn't lying to the public just to get elected?
And they'll get a mention when comparing healthcare outcomes......:D
As I'm sure you're aware they were run very well by a socialist government and the leader went on to become NATO Secretary General. Hardly communism