Virgil van Dijk

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hmm. Whilst Stones and Otamendi haven't strictly been bad signings, we do seem to have developed an ugly proclivity to grossly overpay for centre backs.

Stones - £47m+
Mangala - £32m
Otamendi - £31m

If we must break the transfer record paid for a defender, I would hope for someone of the ilk of Bonucci or Alderweireld.
 
Hmm. Whilst Stones and Otamendi haven't strictly been bad signings, we do seem to have developed an ugly proclivity to grossly overpay for centre backs.

Stones - £47m+
Mangala - £32m
Otamendi - £31m

If we must break the transfer record paid for a defender, I would hope for someone of the ilk of Bonucci or Alderweireld.

Mangala was 42m[emoji851][emoji854]
 
If we sign Dijk, could this mean Ota on his way? Rumours were Ota had some important offers for the summer....Kompany, Stones, Dijk and Kolarov would seem enough cover for the CB position.
 
Totally hypothetical obviously, but what would 2009-aged/version of Lescott cost in today's market with Everton still taking the piss?
 
If we sign Dijk, could this mean Ota on his way? Rumours were Ota had some important offers for the summer....Kompany, Stones, Dijk and Kolarov would seem enough cover for the CB position.
Doubt it. We would be Kompany injury away from playing Stones and Van Dijk every game. I don't think Kolarov is even good enough, certainly not against top opposition. Otamendi should stay unless we get very good offer

£60m for Van Dijk is just taking the piss but the market is what it is, especially when trying to buy from other PL clubs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top