Del_Bosque
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 2,832
The journalists write the article
A sub-editor then writes the head line and choses a picture
A sub-editor then writes the head line and choses a picture
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kyle Walker
- Thread starter Jumanji
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
NO. If we spend 55 instead of 40 we have 15 less to spend.
The only way what you are suggesting makes sense is if we know we are going to sell someone for 15 more than we had planned. AND have factored that into our decision to pay more than we budgeted for Walker. So if someone happens to want to give us 33 million for Hart and we know that and have decided to use that unforeseen bonus to get the deal done then you have a point.
Yeah that's what I was getting at. For example were we expecting to loan Unal out again? Will we get an offer we can't refuse for Roberts when we expecting another loan (possible if we get Sanchez) etc.
Paulmcfc2703
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 9,278
Technically for the purpose of this financial year we have £3 million less to spend based on Walkers 5 year contractNO. If we spend 55 instead of 40 we have 15 less to spend.
The only way what you are suggesting makes sense is if we know we are going to sell someone for 15 more than we had planned. AND have factored that into our decision to pay more than we budgeted for Walker. So if someone happens to want to give us 33 million for Hart and we know that and have decided to use that unforeseen bonus to get the deal done then you have a point.
BlueDeadHead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jul 2014
- Messages
- 2,999
No it isn`t.There will be NO impact on our proposed moves for other players just because we may have spent an additional £15M (according to you) on one player.As someone else pointed out to you,we aint a fucking Local government nor a NHS which has to watch every penny.If you think we could not find your imaginary £15M short fall for a transfer target then you really are deluded.
What don`t you understand, it will NOT impact any potential transfers at all.Your name really says a lot about you DeadHead !!!
You ever thought that maybe this 15 added to maybe and extra 5 we may have to pay for Mendy minus the 10 we were hoping for for Bony plus the extra 10 we may have to pay for Sanchez minus the 5 we were hoping to get for Hart might add up to enough of a sum to affect our transfer dealings.
We have a budget. Every sale is going to affect it. That is EXACTLY why we negotiate EVERY transfer.
80s Shorts
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,616
NO. If we spend 55 instead of 40 we have 15 less to spend.
The only way what you are suggesting makes sense is if we know we are going to sell someone for 15 more than we had planned. AND have factored that into our decision to pay more than we budgeted for Walker. So if someone happens to want to give us 33 million for Hart and we know that and have decided to use that unforeseen bonus to get the deal done then you have a point.
DeadHead..... I like your username.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
I wonder if the club saw that £25M coming in for Iheanacho ?Unless we make £15m or more we weren't expecting to make.
jimharri
Moderator
How dare you call me a prick!Is this prick on Twitter?
BlueDeadHead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jul 2014
- Messages
- 2,999
Yeah that's what I was getting at. For example were we expecting to loan Unal out again? Will we get an offer we can't refuse for Roberts when we expecting another loan (possible if we get Sanchez) etc.
No way to know. I guess I would say for this to have any impact on the Walker decision we would have to have made a decision to say...sell instead of loan Roberts. Its quite possible they did make that type of decision.
BlueDeadHead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jul 2014
- Messages
- 2,999
DeadHead..... I like your username.
Thanks. Bobby likes your shorts.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
No way to know.
By the same token, you have no idea what we budgeted for Walker. Maybe we would have gone much higher. We would have had a list of targets and possible costs. I think we got him cheap and this allowed us to buy Douglas.
Conjecture obviously but could be equally as right as your theory.
BlueDeadHead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jul 2014
- Messages
- 2,999
I wonder if the club saw that £25M coming in for Iheanacho ?
Absolutely. That was our asking price and we have been planning to sell him for months. That money has been baked in already.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
Absolutely. That was our asking price and we have been planning to sell him for months. That money has been baked in already.
No way to know
BlueDeadHead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jul 2014
- Messages
- 2,999
By the same token, you have no idea what we budgeted for Walker. Maybe we would have gone much higher. We would have had a list of targets and possible costs. I think we got him cheap and this allowed us to buy Douglas.
Conjecture obviously but could be equally as right as your theory.
Of course...I am going off the 40 number that I think floated around for a while.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
So in your tiny mind we are fucked because we spent (according to you) £15M more than we could afford and the impact will be disastrous.Quick someone tell our leader ... Don`t Panic Captain Khaldoon,don`t panic,DeadHead says we`re fucked !!You ever thought that maybe this 15 added to maybe and extra 5 we may have to pay for Mendy minus the 10 we were hoping for for Bony plus the extra 10 we may have to pay for Sanchez minus the 5 we were hoping to get for Hart might add up to enough of a sum to affect our transfer dealings.
We have a budget. Every sale is going to affect it. That is EXACTLY why we negotiate EVERY transfer.
I`ll let you have the last word on the subject as no doubt you`ll not sleep well if you don`t ... flappers never do.
80s Shorts
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,616
Thanks. Bobby likes your shorts.
You really are chatting shit if you think an extra 15m amortised over a four or five year contract is going to impact upon our transfer business this window.
BlueDeadHead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jul 2014
- Messages
- 2,999
What does that have to do with Bobby's shorts?You really are chatting shit if you think an extra 15m amortised over a four or five year contract is going to impact upon our transfer business this window.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
Of course...I am going of the 40 number that I think floated around for a while.
When we signed Silva there was a quote that said something like our hierarchy are confident by the end of the window the Silva fee will look like a bargain. So they knew the way it was going. So possible they factored in a higher fee.
BlueDeadHead
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jul 2014
- Messages
- 2,999
So in your tiny mind we are fucked because we spent (according to you) £15M more than we could afford and the impact will be disastrous.Quick someone tell our leader ... Don`t Panic Captain Khaldoon,don`t panic,DeadHead says we`re fucked !!
I`ll let you have the last word on the subject as no doubt you`ll not sleep well if you don`t ... flappers never do.
I think you should go back and read my original post on this subject.
Someone asked why certain posters get upset about fees. I answered that question.
I personally am delighted we have signed Walker and the cost doesn't really bother me.
80s Shorts
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,616
What does that have to do with Bobby's shorts?
So you're on the wum and you haven't looked up what amortisation means. Gnight you plum.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.