Is Defoe still on the market? Maybe Bebe?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alexis Sanchez
- Thread starter Decepticon
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
Is Defoe still on the market? Maybe Bebe?
No, Sanchez and Mbappe are though.
We may have a chance at Sanchez. Mbappe isn't happening.No, Sanchez and Mbappe are though.
Telling I think that he's now saying how he could be sold from under his own nose and not be able to do anything about it. Seems based on reports that City are finally starting to work with Arsenal toward an appropriate fee to get this done.
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
We may have a chance at Sanchez. Mbappe isn't happening.
you're entitled to your opinion.
Haha! You think we're getting Mbappe this window?you're entitled to your opinion.
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
Haha! You think we're getting Mbappe this window?
why not? Don't see why we have to be so pessimistic about it when the window isn't even shut.
Because we won't be spending way over £100m on one player. It's pure fantasy.why not? Don't see why we have to be so pessimistic about it when the window isn't even shut.
J_MCFC21
Well-Known Member
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
Because we won't be spending way over £100m on one player. It's pure fantasy.
clearly isn't.
You keep believing champ. Hopefully you won't be too disappointed when nothing happens.clearly isn't.
Didsbury Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2007
- Messages
- 39,262
Likkle City bid £100m for a player nearly 10 years ago when transfer fees were a fraction of today's.Because we won't be spending way over £100m on one player. It's pure fantasy.
That's when we had a lunatic getting ahead of himself. That didn't last long. It's fuck all to do with 'Lickle City' either.Likkle City bid £100m for a player nearly 10 years ago when transfer fees were a fraction of today's.
"It’s my decision, but after the board has to, of course, agree with me. And if they don’t agree we have to consider it as well, and I will accept it. But the board is behind me on that."
His quotes seem oddly inconsistent. That last bit suggests that he has the board's backing, whereas the bit before implies doubt.
His quotes seem oddly inconsistent. That last bit suggests that he has the board's backing, whereas the bit before implies doubt.
Didsbury Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2007
- Messages
- 39,262
You really think that flash Abu Dhabi geezer was controlling the MCFC purse strings?That's when we had a lunatic getting ahead of himself. That didn't last long. It's fuck all to do with 'Lickle City' either.
It's always been The Sheikh and co, mate. You claimed MCFC would never bid £100m for a player. We did, rendering your point wrong.
It's just Wenger being Wenger."It’s my decision, but after the board has to, of course, agree with me. And if they don’t agree we have to consider it as well, and I will accept it. But the board is behind me on that."
His quotes seem oddly inconsistent. That last bit suggests that he has the board's backing, whereas the bit before implies doubt.
Didsbury Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2007
- Messages
- 39,262
Actually I've just realised you meant Garry Cook. The same point applies.That's when we had a lunatic getting ahead of himself. That didn't last long. It's fuck all to do with 'Lickle City' either.
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
"It’s my decision, but after the board has to, of course, agree with me. And if they don’t agree we have to consider it as well, and I will accept it. But the board is behind me on that."
His quotes seem oddly inconsistent. That last bit suggests that he has the board's backing, whereas the bit before implies doubt.
Sounds like he hasn't a clue.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.