It's Quiet - a new dawn

Status
Not open for further replies.
RobinHood said:
TONY-PULIS_2694555.jpg

Caption competition...
Click to expand...

Just 24 hours to find out whether the JFE saga has been one giant piss-take in revenge for Gillingham.
 
pavelsrnicek said:
From the most recent stories it would appear that in the next 25 hours
- if we offer £70m for Sanchez and they can sign a replacement we sign Sanchez.
-if Mangala agrees to go to WBA and we agree to pay £30m for Evans then we sign Evans.

So we could easily spend £100m or as easily spend nothing.

If our move for Sanchez really does rely on them getting a replacement then tomorrow could end up being a damp squib
Click to expand...

I was thinking the same mate....cant see Arsenal finding a replacement this late in the window. It would seem we also waiting to ship out Mangala before signing Evans, so not sure that will end up happening (but that might be a good thing!;)
 
TRUE BLUE NO1 said:
I was thinking the same mate....cant see Arsenal finding a replacement this late in the window. It would seem we also waiting to ship out Mangala before signing Evans, so not sure that will end up happening (but that might be a good thing!;)
Click to expand...

Can't help but feel that Arsenal have wanted all along to let him go without a replacement. They've known he wants out all summer and haven't moved.
 
Dobsy said:
Can't help but feel that Arsenal have wanted all along to let him go without a replacement. They've known he wants out all summer and haven't moved.
Click to expand...
Either that or the penny-pinchers are waiting to get City's Sanchez money to pay the full fee demanded by Leicester for Mahrez. If this comes to be the case, I really hope Leicester increase their price and shaft them royally.
If they really are idiots and haven't lined up any replacements for Sanchez, despite knowing the outcome since the end of last season, maybe the board (specifically Kroenke) is planning to pocket the 100-odd million (including the fees for Oxlade) and finally jump the sinking ship.
 
Dobsy said:
Can't help but feel that Arsenal have wanted all along to let him go without a replacement. They've known he wants out all summer and haven't moved.
Click to expand...

I agree. Either that or they bid 50M and get Mahrez. He would move there and that bid is all it would take to get that done. Keep some cash in the bank but sign a replacement that appeases some fans. Leicester have said Mahrez can go they just want that figure and no one has come close. Barkley is another option. Everton will let him go for 30m. He is English, injured and unsure of where his best position is on the pitch. He is also inconsistent. He ticks the boxes for a Wenger signing! Can replace Oxlade Chamberlain and join Walcott on the aforementioned list.
 
If reports are true that Delph's move to Stoke and Bony's to Swansea have fallen through then that's about £25m less in the kitty than we anticipated.
 
Chelsea won't sign Llorente if Bony goes to Italy instead. Think I'm ok with that to see the Conte meltdown not getting Llorente and AOC whom he probably had both boxed off.
 
Ric said:
If reports are true that Delph's move to Stoke and Bony's to Swansea have fallen through then that's about £25m less in the kitty than we anticipated.
Click to expand...

People on here don't seem to care about the money. The concept of finite resources is an alien one. Fifty million here, sixty million there, who cares? Its not like there is a knock-on effect, right???
 
Ric said:
If reports are true that Delph's move to Stoke and Bony's to Swansea have fallen through then that's about £25m less in the kitty than we anticipated.
Click to expand...
What Bony reports? Haven't seen anything of the sort, only that verona also want him on loan. Please tell me his swansea deal isnt off
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top