abu13
Well-Known Member
He’ll be as quiet as a mouse in the Derby.
Fuck, you've gone and said it now haven't you :)
He’ll be as quiet as a mouse in the Derby.
Anybody had utd fans say that it's boring this season, the league is rubbish and the standard has dropped?
I got a couple of dad's at my kids school who are your typical fickle utd fan. Ded chatty if they win, ded giddy if we get beat, complete silence if they lose and completely ignore if we win.
One even said the league is boring this season.
Never seem to have watched their match if they lose, watched every second of it if they've won.
So see through and so predictable. I've had them on toast this season nearly every week, it's been an absolute joy.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.da...inho-eat-chocolate-blasts-Tommy-Docherty.html
Even there legends prefer to watch us:-)
Jose Mourinho would eat himself if he was chocolate... I'd be amazed if he lasts any length of time at Manchester United, blasts Tommy Docherty
Exactly, their policy is fucked. They had no requirement for him, I would argue the same with Lukaku.
In fact there is a real argument that they should have saved the money from Pogba, Lukaku and Sanchez and really addressed their weaknesses.
I think that financial success is more important to them than building a team that is totally successful on the field. You may think they are the same thing and given time they may converge but individual stars make them more money than watching stars develop.The rags' basic problem is that, unlike City, they have no vision for the future and no plan for the present. This goes back to having no succession planning for GPC's retirement 5 years ago. Whereas City buy players to fit into Pep's tactical palns and style of play Woodwood and Maureen just pick up players who they think have a greater commercial appeal with shirt sales and twitter followers. Then they just shoehorn them into the side with no tactical plan whatsoever. The latest example is squeezing Sanchez into the left wing position and displacing Martial from his natural position to the right. Totally fucking clueless the lot of them.
Sanchez was done only so that we don't get him. Lukaku may not have been their first choice, but he is definitely a Mourinho centre-forward. 100 goals at the age of 24 is a great stat to have and he still has time to improve. At the time of signing Pogba, they definitely needed a WC midfielder. It just didn't work out for them well.
Utds doom should be as concerning to them as ours was when we dropped into the old div 3.
Terrible money spent on good but awfully under performing players in most part due to the succession of laughable managers who cannot get the best out of them. As a knock on effect sponsorship and merchandise sales will drop.
I think it was THIS season that was their "Gillingham" year and its not happened.
If the manager and his negativity doesn't go their best players will want to in the summer.
I think they'll keep him though and throw some more money at it because the board are scared of him and have invested a lot and that is even worse than getting rid imo.
LOL.
Who cares anyway, remember Blues and never forget the total indignity and lack of respect they showed us for years and years.
Let's stick it to them.
Old Trafford was half empty towards the end of the 80s and this was when they were chucking money round left right and centre on Ince, Webb and Pallister. They will be back to the fan base of Salford, Moston and Wythenshaw.
Told this to a Rag at work. He said it can't be true as they had the highest attendances in the league even when they were in the 2nd Division. Not sure how accurate posted attendance figures would have been in those days.
I think that financial success is more important to them than building a team that is totally successful on the field. You may think they are the same thing and given time they may converge but individual stars make them more money than watching stars develop.
Told this to a Rag at work. He said it can't be true as they had the highest attendances in the league even when they were in the 2nd Division. Not sure how accurate posted attendance figures would have been in those days.
And a Rag would know such things how exactly ?
They had the 2nd highest attendances in seasons ending 89 & 90 and also 93 despite winning their 1st league title for 26 years that year.Told this to a Rag at work. He said it can't be true as they had the highest attendances in the league even when they were in the 2nd Division. Not sure how accurate posted attendance figures would have been in those days.
I’m not sure they had the highest attendances in the country that season, but it was one of the best.
But it wasn’t really a surprise, as they were winning most weeks and, as we know, every glory hunter loves a winning team.