D
D
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
hilts
Well-Known Member
no you are not getting the point - if you piss someone off they won't even let you in to read their fucking gas meter - I know where they were supposed to be going but having bombed Syria should we be surprised when they get the hump ffs?
Why wouldn’t they let them in if they conclude Assad is not to blame or it cannot be proved one way or the other this is to their benefit no?
hilts
Well-Known Member
He posts on here quite a bit but I haven’t worked out which one of our conspiracy nuts he is, maybe he has multiple accounts.
Like everyone else in this story he has an agenda but as he has lived in Beirut for 30 years Fisk has forgotten more about the middle east than May Macron et al have ever known
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,603
Not so much:
France, meanwhile, has said it has “proof” chemical weapons were used, and US media have quoted sources saying urine and blood tests showed this too. The WHO has said its partners on the ground treated 500 patients “exhibiting signs and symptoms consistent with exposure to toxic chemicals”.
At the same time, inspectors from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) are currently blocked from coming here to the site of the alleged gas attack themselves
Why wouldn’t they let them in if they conclude Assad is not to blame or it cannot be proved one way or the other this is to their benefit no?
According to May's speech today, the inspectors cannot conclude who was to blame for the attack. They're there to establish whether there was an attack and whether it involved chemical weapons (contrary to the Syrian position).
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,603
Well they aren’t allowed for a start as the last time they did, Russia threw a thrombie in the U.N. and used it’s veto to ensure that they are only allowed to conclude an attack took place and not to speculate on who fired the stuff.According to May's speech today, the inspectors cannot conclude who was to blame for the attack.
Odd that they’d feel that way I’m sure everyone will agree.
hilts
Well-Known Member
According to May's speech today, the inspectors cannot conclude who was to blame for the attack. They're there to establish whether there was an attack and whether it involved chemical weapons (contrary to the Syrian position).
So what disadvantage are the inspectors to Assad?
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,603
Well the Russian position is now that no chemical attack took place and they were all actors, certainly according to the Russian General Kiam was quoting yesterday.So what disadvantage are the inspectors to Assad?
So what disadvantage are the inspectors to Assad?
They'd be able to state that a chemical attack happened, exposing Assad's position as a lie.
hilts
Well-Known Member
They'd be able to state that a chemical attack happened, exposing Assad's position as a lie.
Maybe that is a reason or because we bombed a couple of warehouses he has seen his arse. He might be part owner of the Damascus diner butty van. No workers no need for the goat burger and coke meal deal.
Ricster
Well-Known Member
The plot thickens.
Ricster
Well-Known Member
Not so much:
France, meanwhile, has said it has “proof” chemical weapons were used, and US media have quoted sources saying urine and blood tests showed this too. The WHO has said its partners on the ground treated 500 patients “exhibiting signs and symptoms consistent with exposure to toxic chemicals”.
At the same time, inspectors from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) are currently blocked from coming here to the site of the alleged gas attack themselves
"ostensibly because they lacked the correct UN permits."
Why did you miss that off the end of your quote? Do you work for the Sun?
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 34,093
Why would that make any difference to the point being made?"ostensibly because they lacked the correct UN permits."
Why did you miss that off the end of your quote? Do you work for the Sun?
Another member of the BBB is in on the action! :)Russian stooge? You are doing a good impression of one yourself.
They'll call you a Conspiracy Theorist be careful.The plot thickens.
Remember you have to accept everything our government say they wouldn't lie to us they haven't done so in the past so why would they start now.....
Ricster
Well-Known Member
They've called me worse.They'll call you a Conspiracy Theorist be careful.
Remember you have to accept everything our government say they wouldn't lie to us they haven't done so in the past so why would they start now.....
Reports of air strikes on an airfield in Homs.
Ohrodneyrodney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2007
- Messages
- 2,420
With the gains the regime had made, and were continuing to make, why do people think they would do this ?
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
It's not just our government though is it, I seriously doubt your mental capacity to assimilate data and to be honest know what your talking about and I'm not exactly on the right wingThey'll call you a Conspiracy Theorist be careful.
Remember you have to accept everything our government say they wouldn't lie to us they haven't done so in the past so why would they start now.....
Ohrodneyrodney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2007
- Messages
- 2,420
They've called me worse.
Reports of air strikes on an airfield in Homs.
? any links