Im not arguing about follow on bombings but lets get it right here, Syria has been bombed non stop for years, many of those bombs falling from Russian jets at the behest of Assad and Putin so its hardly news.
Im asking why, after the plea from Russia for an independent inspection team at the alleged site of the chemical attack have they now denied access to the same independent inspection team they asked for in front of the world?
I honestly dont have the answer to why they wont allow the inspectors in. Im guessing but if i had said that id allow inspectors in, there would be some conditions set.
It's all ifs and buts. I can't speculate on those but why should they agree to the West's demands after the West's acts of aggression over the weekend and now todays missiles from another aggressor.
Whatever the story we wont fibd out the whole truth and we are left wondering what will happen to another sorry ME country.
Assad is defeating the rebels (ISIS).
Why for 6 years have we funded those terrorists and trained them? There is another question that needs answered. Probably the same reason as Libya, so we can allow small terrorist factions to fight over a country. Allow NGOs to pick up those fleeing in dingys, risking their own and their families lives or maybe we can allow people to be enslaved like Libya?
Do you think the fall of Ghadaffi has been a good thing for the people of Libya? The country is an absolute mess, that major NGO's cant get into and it'll take a lot more than "clearing a few dead bodies off the beach" like good old Boris said. Such a laugh a minute that bloke.
Why has Assad and the Ruskis been doing bombing runs?
What does the UK, US and other Allies gain from the fall of Assad?
(Realise the reply is longwinded, gone backwards and forwards in my reply to you)