Family stuff
But with regard this latest nonsense - I have indeed replied and and addressed your 'selective' stats - see it within my post a couple up.
In fact I have exposed the extent to which you are either selective and disingenuous in the way you post such stats or you are completely unable to assess/analyse/understand basic facts.
Not for your benefit I assume, because I suspect that the fact is that you know the reality but hide behind bluster, but for others:
The clue is with regard to the areas I bolded and explained 'Metropolitan areas'.
Are you going to stop replying now or do you really need to make a bigger fool of yourself?
Family commitments so still not able to reply properly or read your recent ramblings.Always the innocent victim, always put upon, always Mr Reasonable, crying to the mods.
Everyone can see what you're doing here.
All the points I've made that you've ignored, all the arguments you've chosen to swerve, all the facts I've quoted that go unchallanged, of all of that, can you at least explain why, if there is no alternative, this happened....
Election 2005, Tony Blair, Labour Leader, 9,552,436 votes, 35.2 %
Election 2010, Gordon Brown, Labour Leader, 8,609,527 votes, 29%
Election 2015, Ed Miliband, Labour Leader, 9,347,273 votes, 30.4%
Election 2017, Jeremy Corbyn, Labour Leader, 12,878,460 votes, 40%
Otherwise, you are everything you accuse me of being.
But with regard this latest nonsense - I have indeed replied and and addressed your 'selective' stats - see it within my post a couple up.
In fact I have exposed the extent to which you are either selective and disingenuous in the way you post such stats or you are completely unable to assess/analyse/understand basic facts.
Not for your benefit I assume, because I suspect that the fact is that you know the reality but hide behind bluster, but for others:
The clue is with regard to the areas I bolded and explained 'Metropolitan areas'.
Are you going to stop replying now or do you really need to make a bigger fool of yourself?