andyhinch
Well-Known Member
He can’t help himself.Fucking wum and you wonder why you get so much shit in here?
He can’t help himself.Fucking wum and you wonder why you get so much shit in here?
At the time he left the club, yeah
Wum? Nope.Fucking wum and you wonder why you get so much shit in here?
Ha! That’s a good’n.They know how to dive properly now. There is that.
Wum? Nope.
It’s a great gesture and that’s just that.
Grow up.
Sums up this forum that
How did Ashley F Young stay on the pitch?Sums up this forum that someone saying nice touch from united with the kids and they are labelled a wum. It was a nice touch, they probably had the time of their lives but let’s let our bitterness get in the way of acknowledgement. Whatever the reasons for them kids they’d have loved every second of it fair play.
In terms of the game they are lucky fuckers. How did Smalling stay on the pitch.
How did Tom Daley stay on the pitch?
Also Smalling should have got a 2nd yellow for the pen.How did Ashley F Young stay on the pitch?
Depends on what part of his body ballooned.Doesn’t sound very performance enhancing.
If she's anything like her dad I hope she nutted a couple of playersNolito's daughter was at the swamp ?
Great for the kids without a doubt but even greater for the Rag PR machine..... it seems now whenever there is this kind of incident (Chilien miners, Thai boys in a cave) the rags seem compelled to invite them over for a day out, it is like they have a patent on such an event.... why do they feel the need? What are they doing for deprived kids in Partington, a few miles from their Carrington training base?Sums up this forum that someone saying nice touch from united with the kids and they are labelled a wum. It was a nice touch, they probably had the time of their lives but let’s let our bitterness get in the way of acknowledgement. Whatever the reasons for them kids they’d have loved every second of it fair play.
I agree havent they suffered enough without having to watch that shite for 90 minutesGreat for the kids without a doubt but even greater for the Rag PR machine..... it seems now whenever there is this kind of incident (Chilien miners, Thai boys in a cave) the rags seem compelled to invite them over for a day out, it is like they have a patent on such an event.... why do they feel the need? What are they doing for deprived kids in Partington, a few miles from their Carrington training base?
Sums up this forum that someone saying nice touch from united with the kids and they are labelled a wum. It was a nice touch, they probably had the time of their lives but let’s let our bitterness get in the way of acknowledgement. Whatever the reasons for them kids they’d have loved every second of it fair play.
In terms of the game they are lucky fuckers. How did Smalling stay on the pitch.
In what way did Tom support the rags at the expense of City? That yesterday with the kids is nothing to do with City. What Tom said was that it was a nice touch, in the same way I said it. For me it may as well have been *insert any football club here*. It’s not supporting anybody, it’s acknowledging a good gesture by a club to some kids who went through hell. You should be able to say that without being rounded on, regardless of ulterior motives by the club in question.And it sums you up that whenever there is an opportunity to support the rags at the expense of your own,you never fail to do so.
Their filthy,manipulative,self serving shit tip of a club couldn't give a flying fuck about them kids.......it was a classic United play! A publicity opportunity and a PR masterstroke - probably the only thing the cvnts are still world class at.
In what way did Tom support the rags at the expense of City? That yesterday with the kids is nothing to do with City. What Tom said was that it was a nice touch, in the same way I said it. For me it may as well have been *insert any football club here*. It’s not supporting anybody, it’s acknowledging a good gesture by a club to some kids who went through hell. You should be able to say that without being rounded on, regardless of ulterior motives by the club in question.
If they were all Spurs fans and invited to tonight’s game at Wembley, would it be a more acceptable to you because it’s not united?
Tom, unlike you btw, gets a hard-on for routinely slagging blues off on a united thread. He does it again and again. That’s not on as far as I’m concerned and I suspect that view is widely shared. I wouldn’t slag a fellow blue off down the pub in the presence of a group of united fans. It’s called looking after your own, in the presence of ‘the enemy’, which is part and parcel of supporting a football club imo. He can say what he wants anywhere else in the board, but repeatedly slagging City fans off on a united thread means he’s a piss-poor excuse for a City supporter imo.In what way did Tom support the rags at the expense of City? That yesterday with the kids is nothing to do with City. What Tom said was that it was a nice touch, in the same way I said it. For me it may as well have been *insert any football club here*. It’s not supporting anybody, it’s acknowledging a good gesture by a club to some kids who went through hell. You should be able to say that without being rounded on, regardless of ulterior motives by the club in question.
If they were all Spurs fans and invited to tonight’s game at Wembley, would it be a more acceptable to you because it’s not united?