You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Spurs’ new stadium
- Thread starter Chris Holmes
- Start date
kippaxwarrior
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 23,437
- Location
- Jupiter Mining Corporation Red Dwarf
- Team supported
- City of course!!
Why doesn't Levy just say "Sorry but it's not going to be ready for this season" I I was a Spurs fan I'd be ripping my hairvout
asahartford1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2016
- Messages
- 9,594
It's not another delay. Spurs haven't set an opening date since the Liverpool game was cancelled back in August.
This is just another update.
So who has led you a merry dance ? Levi, the owners, the media, or someone else, because season tickets were sold for a new stadium mate not for Wembley, or am I wrong.
mac
Well-Known Member
JimB is Levy.
newall blue
Active Member
- Joined
- 7 Dec 2009
- Messages
- 27
Looking ahead, they are due to play Brighton at "home" on FA Cup semi final weekend. Hmmm......
M
M
mat
Guest
What odds Sky move it to Friday or Monday to accommodate their media pals?Looking ahead, they are due to play Brighton at "home" on FA Cup semi final weekend. Hmmm......
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
Nice Ad hominem there @JimB. You were complaining about such things just last week.Honoured to have a stalker on this forum. Complete with out of context quotes. Cheers, fella!
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
Nah Levy is alright. :)JimB is Levy.
Why doesn't Levy just say "Sorry but it's not going to be ready for this season" I I was a Spurs fan I'd be ripping my hairvout
So who has led you a merry dance ? Levi, the owners, the media, or someone else, because season tickets were sold for a new stadium mate not for Wembley, or am I wrong.
Spurs fans are certainly pissed off - about the delay; about Wembley; about the lack of certainty; about the ticket rearrangements. Understandably so. The difficulty for the club has been that neither Mace nor the specialist subcontractors were able to put a date on when the remedial work and testing will be completed. They just didn't know what they were going to find or how extensive the problems were. Given that the club has been embarrassed before, they aren't going to risk setting another date until they have the required safety certificates.
As to why they haven't binned the idea of moving this season altogether, I would guess that that is primarily a financial decision. As you know, attendances at Wembley have plummeted. They are losing money every further game that they have to play there. Furthermore, if Spurs had unilaterally decided some time ago to play all games this season at Wembley, it would likely have seriously compromised their case for liquidated damages.
Looking ahead, they are due to play Brighton at "home" on FA Cup semi final weekend. Hmmm......
With regard to announcing a date for the first game at the new stadium, one further complication is the continued involvement of both Crystal Palace and Brighton in the FA Cup. Home games against those clubs are scheduled for the quarter final and semi final weekends respectively. So Spurs obviously can't guarantee those dates either. With specific reference to the Brighton game, there does appear to be some hope now that remedial work and testing will be complete by then and that the relevant certificates will have been received. In which case, there would be no fixture clash regardless of whether or not Brighton are still in the cup.
Nice Ad hominem there @JimB. You were complaining about such things just last week.
Argumentum ad hominem is a fallacious device to undermine an argument without reference to the actual argument.
gingerprince didn't offer an argument so, by definition, light-heartedly referring to him as a stalker cannot be argumentum ad hominem.
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
Selective!Argumentum ad hominem is a fallacious device to undermine an argument without reference to the actual argument.
gingerprince didn't offer an argument so, by definition, light-heartedly referring to him as a stalker cannot be argumentum ad hominem.
Selective!
Only if you wish to compare apples with oranges.
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
It was a joke Jim but not as you know it.Only if you wish to compare apples with oranges.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
You should be hoping Brighton stay in the cup. That way your game against them gets rearranged due to FA Cup commitments, rather than due to Spurs not having a stadium to play the game in.With regard to announcing a date for the first game at the new stadium, one further complication is the continued involvement of both Crystal Palace and Brighton in the FA Cup. Home games against those clubs are scheduled for the quarter final and semi final weekends respectively. So Spurs obviously can't guarantee those dates either. With specific reference to the Brighton game, there does appear to be some hope now that remedial work and testing will be complete by then and that the relevant certificates will have been received. In which case, there would be no fixture clash regardless of whether or not Brighton are still in the cup.
So if Brighton are out are spurs in serious shit? Of course not the fucking sham will be allowed to continue. Their tenancy expired at Wembley and the fa should have the balls to kick the swatting scum out and let spurs deal with repercussions from the league/tv etcYou should be hoping Brighton stay in the cup. That way your game against them gets rearranged due to FA Cup commitments, rather than due to Spurs not having a stadium to play the game in.
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
Why would the FA do that when they are making money from Spurs continuing to play at Wembley?So if Brighton are out are spurs in serious shit? Of course not the fucking sham will be allowed to continue. Their tenancy expired at Wembley and the fa should have the balls to kick the swatting scum out and let spurs deal with repercussions from the league/tv etc
The FA will stage both semi-finals at Wembley and take the rent whenever the PL ask Sours to play Brighton.
So if Brighton are out are spurs in serious shit? Of course not the fucking sham will be allowed to continue. Their tenancy expired at Wembley and the fa should have the balls to kick the swatting scum out and let spurs deal with repercussions from the league/tv etc
Why so bothered about it?
MCFCTrick
Well-Known Member
Why so bothered about it?
I think it's to do with the fact that we know had it been us (and others) in such a situation, the FA would have been down on us like a ton of bricks. Fined to the hilt at every missed deadline, and there would be live crucifixions via the meeja etc.
I think it's to do with the fact that we know had it been us (and others) in such a situation, the FA would have been down on us like a ton of bricks. Fined to the hilt at every missed deadline, and there would be live crucifixions via the meeja etc.
I genuinely don't believe that City's treatment would have been much, if any, different.
More generally, apologies for pointing out what strikes me when reading numerous posts on Bluemoon but there is something of a persecution mentality creeping in to City fans' psyche. Reminiscent of Liverpool. It's not my intention to come on to another team's board and be critical but I just think that it's something that you guys should guard against. I get that you're defensive. Quite understandable. But when people start imagining persecution in every little thing or any hypothetical outcome, it goes too far and invites ridicule.
I dunno. What do you guys think about it? Do you not agree that this kind of thinking needs nipping in the bud? Probably a discussion for another thread, to be honest.