Interesting developments that lead us into all sorts of areas of speculation. But just remember that much of what we see is just that.
Also, a word of caution. Whilst some of us welcome the prospect of clearing our name in Court it's worth bearing in mind that there are sometimes maverick decisions from a single judge that go absolutely contrary to the evidence they have heard. So, no matter how strong the evidence may appear, nothing is a foregone conclusion. Furthermore, it's worth bearing in mind, that the burden of proof in civil proceedings is "on the balance of probabilities" and not "beyond reasonable doubt".
That said, today's statement from City is welcome. We have two lines of attack here, the process and the result of the process. If an attack on the first succeeds, the second falls away by default . For the reasons covered on here many times and articulated in the club's statement we are attacking the integrity of the investigation and quite rightly so.
The right to a fair trial is a fundamental Human Right under Article 6 of the European Convention on civil rights. Whether that specific article applies to this particular case is one for the lawyers but the point is that the same standards should be applied to any form of regulatory proceedings. To ensure that this is the case it's imperative that an investigation is conducted with objectivity.
By way of illustation, this principle has recently been articulated in guidelines for our Government Counter Fraud Profession which says (in a statement of the blindingly obvious);
"Whether operating in a criminal, civil, disciplinary or regulatory field, investigators are expected to display the highest standards of professionalism, objectivity, fairness, expertise, integrity and vision. The conduct of all investigationswill abide by these principles and if a conflict of interests exists, investigators will disclose this fact at the earliest opportunity"
The guidance goes on in a similar vein and is aimed at investigators in this country and has been adopted by all the largest investigatory bodies including the police. The point being that the principles described are fundamental to a properly conducted enquiry anywhere at any time.
I leave it to you to judge, on what little we know, whether this process has been conducted to any "standard of professionalism, objectivity, fairness, expertise or vision"