Solution - well done mate
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Var debate 2019/20
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
They told us he was how many mm, 11, so I’m sure they could, how reproducible and accurate it would be is another matter.
In essence my point was down playing its accuracy and using it for clear offsides that have been missed, and giving advantage to attacker or defender for those var can’t be 100% sure.
Perhaps they are using some form of super powerrful X Ray to pick out the shoulder bones of the players involved, then measuring the centre of each & using lazer like beams to then draw a line perfectly straight, to the ground.
Or perhaps they are just telling lies.
Feed the Elk
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 1,709
it simply does not sit well with me that 3 or more persons who are supposed to be not in any way influenced by any club can sit behind a locked door and trump up a reason for not giving a goal,they can even jiggle the frames around to suit their final decision,as i pointed out in previous the only way VAR will work and work without any prejudice would be to remove the human decision (computer tech if available) if not ready then VAR is not ready,its going to be highlighted every week until the end of season and my guess is they will bin it
Using computer tech is the only way it will work as day one has already proven that the game is too fast for human decision making (even assuming there is no element of bias)
Ps loving your use of the word ‘trump’ in this context :)
And if that puts us onside, rubbing it out and starting again, agreePerhaps they are using some form of super powerrful X Ray to pick out the shoulder bones of the players involved, then measuring the centre of each & using lazer like beams to then draw a line perfectly straight, to the ground.
Or perhaps they are just telling lies.
marco
Well-Known Member
im sure they wouldnt lie 'would they!'Perhaps they are using some form of super powerrful X Ray to pick out the shoulder bones of the players involved, then measuring the centre of each & using lazer like beams to then draw a line perfectly straight, to the ground.
Or perhaps they are just telling lies.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
im sure they wouldnt lie 'would they!'
No, of course not.
They actually have the latest weapons grade technology in that room, with John Moss.
Heisenberg's Blue Sky
Well-Known Member
If its computer tech then it has to be computer tech that makes the decision without human interference or what is the point but that the clear and obvious error application can ONLY be decided by human decision and that can be biased and manipulated so we are back at square one. While the tech works for other sports im just not sure its ready for football (goal line tech being the exception).
also Dean didnt want to give the penalty, he actually waved it away but the voice in his ear told him it was a penalty before VAR was even used , so if it wasnt the VAR officials talking to him who made that split decision that it was a penalty and told Dean to give it?
marco
Well-Known Member
i'm being serious here- how about micro chips in a players boot to prove offside (this will be 100% proof) and the other parts of the body become non offside
I think great idea but doesn’t solve when was ball played unless that is chipped as welli'm being serious here- how about micro chips in a players boot to prove offside (this will be 100% proof) and the other parts of the body become non offside