Zenmanc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2017
- Messages
- 6,070
- Location
- Cued up at Wright's Fish & Chips
- Team supported
- The Treble Winners
Yes, multiple times. That he wasn't flagged doesn't he wasn't offsides.Was he offside this week?
Yes, multiple times. That he wasn't flagged doesn't he wasn't offsides.Was he offside this week?
Thanks Yoda.Always offside he is.
Dinho has final third quality.Gundo and KDB have final third quality and thus playing deeper with a dedicated holding mid makes sense as they can drop back then move forward as needed. Playing 2 players who are not noted for their offensive playmaking together limits the attack.
Fantastic. Who else was offside but wasn't flagged? Or were you only watching for Jesus?Yes, multiple times. That he wasn't flagged doesn't he wasn't offsides.
Right and Wrong.That stay doesn't factor in the number of times he's so far offsides the play breaks down. A stat like this is rubbish for telling anyone who is actually offsides more... It's like a stat that compares the number of speeding tickets 2 blokes have- it may be indicative that the one with more speeds more often but if the one with less has only been driving a fraction as long and is speeding so fast on occasion his car breaks down before the copper nabs him or so fast the speed gun breaks... pointless.
they should divide this forum into two sections, one for the smart posters and one for the rest of us :)Right and Wrong.
The reason why that stat is unhelpful is because it's based on "games" rather than "minutes". If it had been number of offsides per "90minutes" then the the claims of uncalled offsides (which you and a few others have latched on to) would have been a dumb one.
The reason why this stat isn't reliable, is because it tells us little about how many minutes each player played in each game. Since Jesus was often a sub, it stands to reason that he played fewer minutes generally than Aguero.
Hence he could be a worse culprit than Aguero albeit his fewer minutes 'per game' gives the appearance of the opposite.
But rather than use the sensible an obvious argument, the biased minds of those who prefer Aguero or perhaps just dislike Gabby simply just jumped to the s first"uncalled offsides" claim it could find.
Bruh!!!
Not if you have 2 fullbacks flying up and down the wing it doesn't - I believe the poster had Cancelo and Angelino as the fullbacks in the post you replied to. Fwiw, I agree that we won't see that in this game as it's probably a risk early on in the season that we don't need to take. I'm sure we'll see it at some stage though and given Spurs' main threat comes through the middle with Erikson and Kane (no Son), I've seen worse teams.Gundo and KDB have final third quality and thus playing deeper with a dedicated holding mid makes sense as they can drop back then move forward as needed. Playing 2 players who are not noted for their offensive playmaking together limits the attack.
Not really a bad view anywhere in the ground, in tier 2 of the FS you'll be fine.Hello
So my friend and i are going to the stadium for the first time since we are not from uk
We have tickets for 2 seats in the family stand 233
I’m wonderig how is the view?
The last time we went defensive in the middle against them we lost and no sergio? won't happenEderson
Cancelo
Stones
Laporte
Angeliño
Rodri
Dinho
De Bruyne
Mahrez
Sterling
Bernardo
Spurs still don't have much in the way of width so I'd go with the two attacking fullbacks and shore up the centre instead. Mahrez and Bernardo at inside forward to leave the two wing backs the wide areas.
You’ll see loads of families.Hello
So my friend and i are going to the stadium for the first time since we are not from uk
We have tickets for 2 seats in the family stand 233
I’m wonderig how is the view?
Just a bit of advice , they won’t let you in with half/half scarves, City scarves only .Hello
So my friend and i are going to the stadium for the first time since we are not from uk
We have tickets for 2 seats in the family stand 233
I’m wonderig how is the view?
Pep said he had slight muscle problem on sat,bernie that is,dinho hasn't played in months,like you say no need to rush either of them,he won't drop dave,he is still the glue that keeps us ticking and in controlNot certain that Bernardo and Fernandinho are 100% fit. If not then keep the side that played so well at West Ham. It's a long season so no need to rush anybody back.
Just a bit of advice , they won’t let you in with half/half scarves, City scarves only .
He means they won't let you into the country.Just a bit of advice , they won’t let you in with half/half scarves, City scarves only .
Haha oh you are serious,i remember the 4 leg breaking tackles in 2 games against us,if all you have got is dirty tactics then i pity youI think we are going to batter you. And by that I mean we are going to try and outmuscle you in midfield, overwhelm you with our physicality or, in other words, try to kick you off the park. That is what Sissoko and Ndombele are there for. And i won't be surprised to see our nasty, snidey, little shit Lamela playing too. (Sadly Alli won't be fit enough to really piss you off with his cheating cocky ways).
We are not West Ham. We can play. And we will want to play in your half and we think we can win. Maybe this our year to beat you. We'll need a bit of luck but it is possible.
And you are right. It is a proper test for Rodri. Lets see how good he is.
No way will Jesus be dropped, he will be our main striker this season slowly edging out Sergio.front six of:
Rodri
Kev
Dave
Mahrez
Raz
Bernie
might be interesting, albeit has Bernie ever played on the left?
Raheem could certainly cause Spuds issues through the middle.
Haha sergio is no kids back upNo way will Jesus be dropped, he will be our main striker this season slowly edging out Sergio.
All a matter of opinions Karen, I can honestly see Jesus starting more matches than Serg this season.Haha sergio is no kids back up