BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 21,511
Tory MP Rory Stewart getting saucy...
Remain now using The Sun / Scousers and controlled sample in the same breath. I thought it couldn't get any funnier with Remain. The gift that refuses to stop giving..
You muddied the waters with the anti-scouser irrelevancies. The point of the original research was obvious. It just happened that because of the boycott of the Sun there was a control sample, so it's possible to compare the voting pattern of areas with large / small numbers of Sun readers fed with anti-EU propaganda.
"Intelligent reasoning" was your choice of words. I think yours has let you down.
Tory MP Rory Stewart getting saucy...
Tory MP Rory Stewart getting saucy...
Remain now using The Sun / Scousers and controlled sample in the same breath. I thought it couldn't get any funnier with Remain. The gift that refuses to stop giving.
or you could read the research instead of being ignorant. here you go. http://www.florianfoos.net/resources/Foos_Bischof_Hillsborough_APSA.pdf
Fuck - please think before pushing this
Q: are you saying that the reason that the majority of scousers voted Remain - was because they do not read the sun?
Please answer yes or no and if yes - explain why
If no - WTF are you going on about?
leavingEUi,c,t,r = α + γMerseysidei,c + λpost Hillsboroughi,t+ β(Merseyside × post Hillsboroughi,c,t) + ς 0Xi,c + τt + ρr + i,c,t'kinell man - don't introduce facts to this debate - they don't want to see evidence
You forgot to carry the three.leavingEUi,c,t,r = α + γMerseysidei,c + λpost Hillsboroughi,t+ β(Merseyside × post Hillsboroughi,c,t) + ς 0Xi,c + τt + ρr + i,c,t
There you have it. The algorithm that proves Remain were right all along. Please keep 'em coming. This is fucking hilarious.
Mane, Firminho and Salah?You forgot to carry the three.
Class, dignity, respect.Mane, Firminho and Salah?
I think the answer to this is we'll probably have to wait and see. In any negotiation things only tend to move once those involved have their options compressed by a deadline. I understand concerns with this sort of brinkmanship, but compared to May who just seemed to put everyone's backs up with her red lines and capitulate in every other respect BJ on the face of it seems to be doing OK. At the very least he does seem able to build rapport which is the starting point in any negotiation. Not a BJ fan btw, but am prepared to at least see what he comes up with rather than prejudge how he's handling things just because he's not my cup of tea politically.I genuinely believe you don’t live in reality.
I’ll keep it simple because I’m not going to allow you to waffle around the point and purposely miss the question.
Since Johnson has been much stronger than May when it comes to no deal, have the EU moved at all on the backstop?
Just a yes or no answer will be needed.
Brexit is a political self interest ideology, which isn't based on common sense.
When they say 'We want our country back!' The 'We' isn't us the majority, it's the elite who want a return to a pre WW2 Britain, where they could do what the fuck they wanted to the British masses, and there was no-one to stop them.
Chlorinated chicken from the US?
EU: fuck that!!
Nazi Nigel & his far right cohorts? Bloody foreigners & their red tape stopping us making big time chlorinated chicken money!
Aussie hormone treated beef, with scientific proof that at least one of hormones is a carcinogenic?
EU: Fuck that!
Nazi Nigel & his far right cohorts? Bloody foreigners & their red tape stopping us making big time hormone treated beef money!
And don't get me started on the dangerous cars, electrical goods and toys that will flood the UK after Brexit, but which are currently banned by the EU for its citizen's safety.
The far right can only be successful in their rhetoric if they manage to convince decent moderate members of the public, that all they're doing is defending the UK's interests. Are they fuck! Does any of this sound familiar? Hitler used a similar tactic to convince his public that all Germany's ills were down to the Jews. Boris & Nazi Nige have done the same against the EU & to underpin this, they've aligned & shielded themselves behind Trump. Trump has used the classic Nazi tactic of claiming the media who are against him are all enemies of the state pedalling fake news, in defence of those he chooses to target. Boris is now doing the same with MPs worried about the effects a no deal Brexit will have on our economy.
The Nazi's claimed all they were doing was defending their nation's interests, just like Fleece-Smogg who trying to prove his dedication to the Brexit cause, has opened a branch of his investment company in Ireland & is planning to open another in France. What about putting all that investment in the UK Smoggy, just like you've told the people of the UK to do? What's good for the goose & all that???
If all Bexiteers truly had the good of the UK at heart, now we know there are 3 options: No Deal, May's deal, or leave it well alone, why the fear of having a confirmatory referendum?
If you buy a financial product, you're entitled to a cooling off period, so why not apply the same to Brexit?
I hear some ready to say 'Leave meant leave'. Well didn't 'Join mean join' in the 1975 referendum?
If Brexiteers couldn't respect that result, why should anyone respect the 2016 result? Best out of three anyone?
Be careful what you wish for.
Well the answer is clearly that they continue to have no need to.@mcfc1632
You’ve bollocks’d up the quote so have to reply like this.
Can you tell me how they’ve moved?
I appreciate the time you spent putting your post together, but it would seem from several of your points that you are equally vulnerable to propaganda and half-truths as the most vehement Leaver. That's part of the problem - each side of the argument views the other as extreme and based on nonsense. This polarizes us and prevents any sensible debate. Perhaps this is a trick played upon us all?Brexit is a political self interest ideology, which isn't based on common sense.
When they say 'We want our country back!' The 'We' isn't us the majority, it's the elite who want a return to a pre WW2 Britain, where they could do what the fuck they wanted to the British masses, and there was no-one to stop them.
Chlorinated chicken from the US?
EU: fuck that!!
Nazi Nigel & his far right cohorts? Bloody foreigners & their red tape stopping us making big time chlorinated chicken money!
Aussie hormone treated beef, with scientific proof that at least one of hormones is a carcinogenic?
EU: Fuck that!
Nazi Nigel & his far right cohorts? Bloody foreigners & their red tape stopping us making big time hormone treated beef money!
And don't get me started on the dangerous cars, electrical goods and toys that will flood the UK after Brexit, but which are currently banned by the EU for its citizen's safety.
The far right can only be successful in their rhetoric if they manage to convince decent moderate members of the public, that all they're doing is defending the UK's interests. Are they fuck! Does any of this sound familiar? Hitler used a similar tactic to convince his public that all Germany's ills were down to the Jews. Boris & Nazi Nige have done the same against the EU & to underpin this, they've aligned & shielded themselves behind Trump. Trump has used the classic Nazi tactic of claiming the media who are against him are all enemies of the state pedalling fake news, in defence of those he chooses to target. Boris is now doing the same with MPs worried about the effects a no deal Brexit will have on our economy.
The Nazi's claimed all they were doing was defending their nation's interests, just like Fleece-Smogg who trying to prove his dedication to the Brexit cause, has opened a branch of his investment company in Ireland & is planning to open another in France. What about putting all that investment in the UK Smoggy, just like you've told the people of the UK to do? What's good for the goose & all that???
If all Bexiteers truly had the good of the UK at heart, now we know there are 3 options: No Deal, May's deal, or leave it well alone, why the fear of having a confirmatory referendum?
If you buy a financial product, you're entitled to a cooling off period, so why not apply the same to Brexit?
I hear some ready to say 'Leave meant leave'. Well didn't 'Join mean join' in the 1975 referendum?
If Brexiteers couldn't respect that result, why should anyone respect the 2016 result? Best out of three anyone?
Be careful what you wish for.
Thanks for your respectful reply, but I'm a very pragmatic sort by nature & not driven by ideology. Therefore, I'm not interested in opinions, only fact, & when the facts are examined, it shows a scary dark side to the whole Brexit ideology.I appreciate the time you spent putting your post together, but it would seem from several of your points that you are equally vulnerable to propaganda and half-truths as the most vehement Leaver. That's part of the problem - each side of the argument views the other as extreme and based on nonsense. This polarizes us and prevents any sensible debate. Perhaps this is a trick played upon us all?
Just one question:Well the answer is clearly that they continue to have no need to.
I am sure that the point that I would have been making - because it is obvious to anyone that is not digging a hole rather than admit that they are wrong - is that you are just continuing to show how you cannot grasp simple and basic matters of negotiations and implementation planning
I have already explained:
a) That there has not been any need for the EU to move at all to this point because they have not yet faced a viable no-deal proposition nor witnessed the political will to use it - that simple fact proves your comments to be simply and plainly wrong
b) That it remains clear to the EU that their sycophants are acting to seek to make sure that the EU does not have to face a viable no-deal proposition and ensure that the EU will ever witness the political will to use it - were you not watching the news yesterday ? - were you nor aware of the meeting of the rebel alliance? - that simple fact proves your comments to be simply and plainly wrong. Why on earth would the EU move at all when they can observe from the sidelines the UK trying to undermine itself?
Therefore it is obvious that any statement by anyone - either on this forum or in the press etc. - that the EU have been facing a viable No-Deal prospect that is backed up by the political will of the HoC to use it is, IMO (and anyone objective I suggest), simply either the tired arguments of someone that cannot grasp basics, or of someone that can never admit when they have gotten matters wrong - and prefer to keep digging a hole and twist words in their desperation.
The test will come if ever the EU find that the UK government cannot be stopped by Westminster from exiting with a No-Deal (so obviously that has not happened yet) and believe that Johnson will actually do it (he has probably gotten himself into a place he cannot back away from). Guess what that situation will mean? Yes - the EU will be, for the first time, facing the prospect of a viable no-deal proposition and, again for the first time, they will be witnessing the political will to use it
FWIW - should the EU ever be faced with a viable no-deal proposition and are sure that their is the political will to use it - I suspect that they will a) not reopen the backstop (they have gotten the themselves into a place where that cannot be an option) and b) find a form of words that can be put into the political declaration that is deemed by the UK's AG to be sufficiently legally binding as to secure either a time limitation, or more likely another approach to fettering - such as genuine arbitration, that allow the WA to be re-presented.
If you cannot understand this further attempt at a Janet and John explanation I suggest that it is just you being addicted to the spade
Well the answer is clearly that they continue to have no need to.
I am sure that the point that I would have been making - because it is obvious to anyone that is not digging a hole rather than admit that they are wrong - is that you are just continuing to show how you cannot grasp simple and basic matters of negotiations and implementation planning
I have already explained:
a) That there has not been any need for the EU to move at all to this point because they have not yet faced a viable no-deal proposition nor witnessed the political will to use it - that simple fact proves your comments to be simply and plainly wrong
b) That it remains clear to the EU that their sycophants are acting to seek to make sure that the EU does not have to face a viable no-deal proposition and ensure that the EU will ever witness the political will to use it - were you not watching the news yesterday ? - were you nor aware of the meeting of the rebel alliance? - that simple fact proves your comments to be simply and plainly wrong. Why on earth would the EU move at all when they can observe from the sidelines the UK trying to undermine itself?
Therefore it is obvious that any statement by anyone - either on this forum or in the press etc. - that the EU have been facing a viable No-Deal prospect that is backed up by the political will of the HoC to use it is, IMO (and anyone objective I suggest), simply either the tired arguments of someone that cannot grasp basics, or of someone that can never admit when they have gotten matters wrong - and prefer to keep digging a hole and twist words in their desperation.
The test will come if ever the EU find that the UK government cannot be stopped by Westminster from exiting with a No-Deal (so obviously that has not happened yet) and believe that Johnson will actually do it (he has probably gotten himself into a place he cannot back away from). Guess what that situation will mean? Yes - the EU will be, for the first time, facing the prospect of a viable no-deal proposition and, again for the first time, they will be witnessing the political will to use it
FWIW - should the EU ever be faced with a viable no-deal proposition and are sure that their is the political will to use it - I suspect that they will a) not reopen the backstop (they have gotten the themselves into a place where that cannot be an option) and b) find a form of words that can be put into the political declaration that is deemed by the UK's AG to be sufficiently legally binding as to secure either a time limitation, or more likely another approach to fettering - such as genuine arbitration, that allow the WA to be re-presented.
If you cannot understand this further attempt at a Janet and John explanation I suggest that it is just you being addicted to the spade