BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 21,511
You can not mitigate a direct implication of your action, that makes no sense. Like saying i'm going to punch myself hard in the balls but not punch in a way that will hurt - the two statements are contradictory. Leaving the EU/CU will mean a boat load of checks required at ports, they will be a legal obligation and they can't be mitigated. If your policy is to leave the EU/CU then the implication is you are advocating we should have a boat load of checks required at ports
Well you could wear a jockstrap :) That would minimise the risk. What you cannot minimise is the actions of a third party doing the punching. You can ask them to go easy but you cannot control whether they do or not.
We can ask the French to go easy on checks at ports immediately after a no deal but we cannot guarantee they will do so. Knowing the French I think we can safely assume they will not ‘go easy’.