BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 37,418
Cheers DaveThe third one is confirm that the ref is blind in one eye, and the fourth is to confirm that he is fulfilling the task that his masters at Uefa have given him!!
Cheers DaveThe third one is confirm that the ref is blind in one eye, and the fourth is to confirm that he is fulfilling the task that his masters at Uefa have given him!!
Do you mean the Aguero one where the defender took out both his legs?On TV -
The Sterling one was a foul but I thought outside of the area, so a free kick not a pen
The Gundogan incident was a forearm to the face, so yes a pen
The Aguero one just after, the defender clearly gets the ball, so no pen.
From one angle it looks like he took his legs (edge of the box view) but from another angle (from the goal line near the incident) he looks like he got the ball cleanly.Do you mean the Aguero one where the defender took out both his legs?
On TV -
The Sterling one was a foul but I thought outside of the area, so a free kick not a pen
The Gundogan incident was a forearm to the face, so yes a pen
The Aguero one just after, the defender clearly gets the ball, so no pen.
It just goes to show that we all see what we want to see - no wonder VAR is a farce.Sterling challenge, defender got the ball
I agree with some of your sentiments but it will stop when they fuck us over and the job is complete in their eyesI think there's definitely a subconscious bias against us domestically and in Europe.
Refs also know that the fallout and public criticism if they make a bad decision against us doesn't come close to what they cop when they make a decision for us or against one of the history teams.
But I don't know why the club or supporters should just accept it. We should be bitter until it stops. It costs us money, games and potentially trophies.
Fuck them. Their job is to get it right for all teams.
It just goes to show that we all see what we want to see - no wonder VAR is a farce.
That’s bullshit, we had two onside goals rules out for offside. Not of of my Liverpool fan mates have disagreed with that.
The referee was poor for both sides. Ok agreed. Why do you think VAR as not even used to review the clear handball by a zagreb defender in the first half? It is universally agreed that it was a clear penalty. The ball went out for a goal kick, so ample opportunity for a review. Seven officials did not see the handball either, I wonder why not?The ref was poor for both sides, do you really think all Officials area told to screw City by UEFA? If this was endemic at some stage an ex referee would be able to sell his story for a lot of money. It doesn’t happen.
However it’s probably a general attitude amongst a lot involved with Uefa that we have scant regard for the competition, that will have a sub conscious effect on their decisions.
Eg, was that a penalty for City? Fuck em, they don’t like us, no, was that a penalty for Barca, course it was, they embrace the CL.
I understand the history of the contempt for the European governing body but are we going to remain so bitter for ever? It will cost us in the long run.
I thought the two shouts for penaltys on Gundogan & Silva were debatable and could go either way.
I didn't see the handball one whilst at the game, as it was down the other end, and i wasn't even aware it had happened until i saw the highlights when i got home, but having seen it and given what penaltys were given for last year in this competiton i can't understand why it wasn't given. Was it picked up straight away on TV, and did they offer any explanation as to why it wasn't given?
I was certain the one on Aguero was a penalty when it happened, and was very surprised it wasn't given by VAR. On the highlights it still looked like a stonewall penalty, the ref gave a corner, but on the replay i saw it looked like Aguero was fouled and had the last touch before it went out of play, did they say why that hadn't been given on the Commentary?
Whilst waiting for the ball to come out of the air Gundo looked for the opposition player and proceeded to back up into him to initiate the contact.Handball nailed on penalty.
Sterling was a decent tackle when reviewed and i wouldnt have given it.
Gundog was rugby tackled, penalty and Kun had his foot stood on so penalty.
Whilst waiting for the ball to come out of the air Gundo looked for the opposition player and proceeded to back up into him to initiate the contact.
The other two definitely should’ve been penalties.
So you’ve seen the incident again and still claim it was a penalty?You are Peter Walton and i claim my £5.
So you’ve seen the incident again and still claim it was a penalty?
We run the risk of looking silly if we claim non-penalties should’ve been given. Gundo went looking for the player and I didn’t need Walton to tell me that, same goes for the one on Raz and the one on Silva - I’m pretty sure there were loads of posts in the match day thread saying they should’ve been given as well.