United thread 2019/20

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't Tell anyone not to laugh at them just stated didn't think Sunday was the time to do it, and as stated previously I have posted lots of times when things have gone well, anyhow cba next time I will post in the correct thread even though the things I mentioned were kind of related to this thread
Can we please give it a rest, this is the Take the Piss Out of the Rags Thread. we have had 46 pages with you at the centre.
 
Noticed these twats don't mutter a word about City now, gone right into their shells, lol. The far bigger gobshites nowadays are the scouse bastards, they're public enemy number one for me now. Still despise the rags with a passion though.
 
Reports in the papers that Chevrolet may not renew their shirt sponsorship (Times).

Deal expires 2021.
 
We need more focus on your pussy ( threads ) Karen
tumblr_m301feBjlr1r5kyvmo9_500.gif
 
I see that the authorities are getting to grips with idiots running onto football pitches.

Not before time too.


Someone will do it at the swamp one day and get man of the match!
(Nicked off facebook).
Im not ashamed to say ..i laughed out loud at this one.
Was just thinking how quiet its bin around here recently....understandable..utd are shit and we have biggerfish to fry...or..new neighbours..
But..lets not ever stop takin the piss out of utd.We did it when they were massive,we took all their shit,suppoorted by sky and bbc footage of 'the banner'
Lets keep the foot on the throat....i,m still buzzing about leicester taking £80 M off utd for a player who has taken phil the faces new contract place...and guided utd down to Mid table obscurity...with Leicester above em.That ..in my book..is the biggest joke of all.
Well played sir Woodward.!!....well played lad.
 
Reports in the papers that Chevrolet may not renew their shirt sponsorship (Times).

Deal expires 2021.
I suspect you can replace "may not" with "will 100% not" given that they never wanted it in the first place. The executive who agreed this deal got sacked for doing so and that was when the rags were still flying high under Ferguson. It couldn't really have gone any worse for Chevrolet since then!
 
Reports in the papers that Chevrolet may not renew their shirt sponsorship (Times).

Deal expires 2021.

It was a totally crooked deal in the first place. The clown in the marketing department who signed it off was fired for exceeding his authority as soon as the GM board heard about it. They wanted to get out of it but no surprise that it was watertight. No doubt he went down the road with a nice wedge from rag central though. Why didn't UEFA investigate this bent sponsorship? (Rhetorical question of course).
 
Adidas deal will reduce significantly if they're out of CL for 2 consecutive seasons isn't it. ?
United's share price dropping to a 2 year low.
Shevrolet having no plans to extend deal.
Squad full of mediocre players and a mid-table manager
Close to relegation and boring football.

How are they going to overcome this ?
 
Adidas deal will reduce significantly if they're out of CL for 2 consecutive seasons isn't it. ?
United's share price dropping to a 2 year low.
Shevrolet having no plans to extend deal.
Squad full of mediocre players and a mid-table manager
Close to relegation and boring football.

How are they going to overcome this ?
Hopefully they aren't.

Big article on Woodward in The Athletic today. He, Matt Judge (who seems to do the transfers) and Richard Arnold (who's the group Managing Director) were all accountants then investment bankers so there isn't a single football person in the top hierarchy. Also it said that they wanted a DoF to be based at their London office in Mayfair, rather than at OT/Carrington. How can you not have your DoF based close to your coaching team and players?
 
Hopefully they aren't.

Big article on Woodward in The Athletic today. He, Matt Judge (who seems to do the transfers) and Richard Arnold (who's the group Managing Director) were all accountants then investment bankers so there isn't a single football person in the top hierarchy. Also it said that they wanted a DoF to be based at their London office in Mayfair, rather than at OT/Carrington. How can you not have your DoF based close to your coaching team and players?

Not a problem. Wouldn’t you like to work in Mayfair (if you were paid enough)? Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Three accountants running the club plus, probably, another one as DoF. Long may it continue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top