It is relevant because whether you, me etc think it should be applied the fact is it has not overturned one decision yet. That is the reality of the situation so people complaining their is bias because it did not overturn the decision well that is actually consistent with all other decisions.
Do I think it was a pen, yes I do so the problem to me is the officiating at the game which sadly is consistent with the rest of the refereeing this weekend all though I appreciate this will bother the thought police.
You can scream in the face that is what VAR is there for but its pretty clear that is not how its being adopted so no I never expected VAR to overturn it.
You seem to be arguing that they are doing something wrong, but they are consistent, because they always do it wrong.
Repeating and condensing what i said earlier, the referee should have given it, (but he may not have seen it clearly) and you can only give what you see. The Video ASSISTANT Referee, irrespective of what the referee saw (or says to him) should have "assisted" him, and told him to either give a penalty or review on the monitor. The fact that VAR consistently fail to actually review, or ever overturn a penalty/ non penalty decision does not make it right, or acceptable, merely entirely PREDICTABLE