General Election - December 12th, 2019

Who will you vote for in the 2019 General Election?

  • Conservative

    Votes: 160 30.9%
  • Labour

    Votes: 230 44.4%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 59 11.4%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 13 2.5%
  • Brexit Party

    Votes: 28 5.4%
  • Plaid Cymru/SNP

    Votes: 7 1.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 21 4.1%

  • Total voters
    518
What a complete load of tosh.
If a deal can't be fully negotiated by 31st December 2020 then the EU can sign up to a WTO Article 24 agreement till the final deal is completed.
I’m afraid it’s your post that’s tosh.
Firstly WTO Article 24 is highly unlikely to be invoked for various reasons.
https://fullfact.org/europe/article-24/
And if you read the detail of Article 24 you’ll find it doesn’t cover services which would fuck us up more than tariffs on trade in goods.
 
I’m afraid it’s your post that’s tosh.
Firstly WTO Article 24 is highly unlikely to be invoked for various reasons.
https://fullfact.org/europe/article-24/
And if you read the detail of Article 24 you’ll find it doesn’t cover services which would fuck us up more than tariffs on trade in goods.
If a trade deal is close then it's likely to happen. It's not the withdrawal act we're taling about. Boris won't fork out another £13bn or break a promise when it's on his gift.
 
Last edited:
Mate, that is it in a nutshell. You can do that in two ways, by restricting ‘greenhouse’ gases - there are differing views on how quickly should be done. And by mitigating them, increasing carbon ‘drains’, for example the rainforest is a ‘drain’ that is getting smaller because of deforestation. The various parties all have targets for attaining carbon zero. I think the most aggressive is 2030 and the least 2050. The NASA science I referenced says...
There is a third (and not mutually exclusive from the others) way; namely developing technology in order that we can remove it mechanically from the atmosphere in huge quantities. Reverse the increase over a steady period. It’s got to be within the wit of man, surely?
 
There is a third (and not mutually exclusive from the others) way; namely developing technology in order that we can remove it mechanically from the atmosphere in huge quantities. Reverse the increase over a steady period. It’s got to be within the wit of man, surely?
I don’t see how designing a giant osmosis plant and positioning them around the globe would be that difficult, just thinking aloud
 
This was actually confirmed to be fake news spread by the Tory party.
You're the one spreading fale news.

The chronology of Khan's early release:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...y-70-freed-terrorists-blasts-failures-london/

The Leveson ruling:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/11/30/leveson-ruling-opened-door-killers-early-release/

Tory policy on stopping early realse (August 2019):
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...ough-stance-stop-criminals-let-automatically/
 
The shit throwing contest is going on from all sides to be fair.

The NHS stuff from the left is so transparent it’s almost condescending.
Not to NHS workers (and in the health sector generally). They're nearly all voting Labour. They know.

Make that anyone in the "caring professions". Maybe the bosses vote Tory but they are the few.
 
Why? it was a Labour change to sentencing laws that brought thia about. It is Tory policy to stop the release after half a sentence of violent criminals or terrorists.
You're mixing up two things. Released Under Investigation was a Tory idea because the Tory cuts to police numbers meant they couldn't process bail allocations in a reasonable time.

It's put far more people at risk than any changes to when convicted terrorists are released.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top