Var debate 2019/20

BJL_City said:
Cos you're a lying twat, you've been the beneficiary of so many screw jobs already it's obscene
Click to expand...

Umm....if you'd actually read the thread properly, you would know that neither Crouchinho nor I have denied that Spurs have been on the end of a good number of favourable VAR decisions. But since you clearly haven't read the thread properly, you don't know that Crouchinho has posted an equally long list of VAR decisions that went against Spurs.

Hence why - without complaining that Spurs have been hard done by overall - we can legitimately counter claims and implications that Spurs always get favourable decisions and must, in some way, be guilty of corruption.

Please....pretty please....with sugar on top....stop misrepresenting what we've said. Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Just seen the penalty decision given by VAR for handball in favour of Villa.....not any different to our first handball claim v the dippers in front of the Kop.
Still seething !
 
give it to gordon said:
Looks like it might have started today as the dippers had a goal ruled out by VAR.
Click to expand...

Whilst it wouldn’t have surprised you if it was given, it was still offside so we shouldn’t be happy with an actual correct decision. The fact we are though sums how their var season has gone. It would have been interesting to see if var ruled a Liverpool goal out, had they scored when he decided to get in the way of a Watford attack. He must have been told the laws again at half time because he actually gave the drop ball as he should have first half. It is always strange watching them though, they are reffed so different.
 
JimB said:
Umm....if you'd actually read the thread properly, you would know that neither Crouchinho nor I have denied that Spurs have been on the end of a good number of favourable VAR decisions. But since you clearly haven't read the thread properly, you don't know that Crouchinho has posted an equally long list of VAR decisions that went against Spurs.

Hence why - without complaining that Spurs have been hard done by overall - we can legitimately counter claims and implications that Spurs always get favourable decisions and must, in some way, be guilty of corruption.

Please....pretty please....with sugar on top....stop misrepresenting what we've said. Cheers.
Click to expand...
And in that list there isn’t a case of it having the impact that decisions have had against us. Plus, no disrespect you were never a threat in terms of domination of the league that city are.
 
JimB said:
Umm....if you'd actually read the thread properly, you would know that neither Crouchinho nor I have denied that Spurs have been on the end of a good number of favourable VAR decisions. But since you clearly haven't read the thread properly, you don't know that Crouchinho has posted an equally long list of VAR decisions that went against Spurs.

Hence why - without complaining that Spurs have been hard done by overall - we can legitimately counter claims and implications that Spurs always get favourable decisions and must, in some way, be guilty of corruption.

Please....pretty please....with sugar on top....stop misrepresenting what we've said. Cheers.
Click to expand...

You've not had anything against you.
 
Radcliffe 1309 said:
Just seen the penalty decision given by VAR for handball in favour of Villa.....not any different to our first handball claim v the dippers in front of the Kop.
Still seething !
Click to expand...

You are wrong, it is totally different. The teams were not playing at Anfield, neither team was playing Manchester City and nobody had whispered down someone's earpiece to ignore a blatant penalty.
 
BJL_City said:
You've not had anything against you.
Click to expand...

Spurs have had a few penalties not given for them to be fair. They have on the other hand have numerous go for them. They are the perfect example of VAR not working, where you can say it’s not working both ways. Us on the other hand it has actually become quite ludicrous to have so many var decisions go against you, with zero for you. That’s what you called bent
 
Watched the Chelsea v Bournemouth with a Chelsea mate of mine and couldn’t believe my eyes when they had a free kick which a Bournemouth player in the wall deliberately elbowed the ball away. No ref or VAR decision given and then went on to lose. Turned to him and said “well u didn’t vote for VAR did u” he wasn’t a happy bunny because he said the same thing to me during the cl game against spuds when sterlings goal was disallowed. Karma
 
Whymewhynot said:
Spurs have had a few penalties not given for them to be fair. They have on the other hand have numerous go for them. They are the perfect example of VAR not working, where you can say it’s not working both ways. Us on the other hand it has actually become quite ludicrous to have so many var decisions go against you, with zero for you. That’s what you called bent
Click to expand...

They've cost other teams a minimum of 12 points this season through VAR cheating.

They also stole a CL semi-final off us.

I won't hear it, they have no leg to stand on and deflectionary tactics trying to deflect from reality is just indefensible really. They would be in relegation mire without it.
 
BJL_City said:
They've cost other teams a minimum of 12 points this season through VAR cheating.

They also stole a CL semi-final off us.

I won't hear it, they have no leg to stand on and deflectionary tactics trying to deflect from reality is just indefensible really. They would be in relegation mire without it.
Click to expand...

Okay, I get it now. You're just wumming. What do you call it on here.........doing a clarky?
 
Does anyone else think this is open to abuse from the gambling sites.
These are big money calls for these sites.
Now this could be a serious problem for football that these calls are from people not in the ground.
Could end up worse than just giving a goalie a brown envelope!
The ref and linesmen/woman should make the call.
 
bondsman said:
And in that list there isn’t a case of it having the impact that decisions have had against us. Plus, no disrespect you were never a threat in terms of domination of the league that city are.
Click to expand...

Eh?

No one claimed that Spurs were threatening to dominate the league! Only pointed out that as many bad decisions have gone against Spurs as for them and that, therefore, Spurs aren't the corrupt, favoured club that some are suggesting. That's all!
 
ballinio said:
BE interesting to see how VAR fucks us over t’row
Click to expand...
Its added an extra element to the game for me now, i know we will get fucked over one way or anither but im not quite sure how. i particulary like the ones that i think are clear cut only to find out there is a secret hidden ruling that wr always seem to be the trailblazzers in finding.
 
abu13 said:
Its added an extra element to the game for me now, i know we will get fucked over one way or anither but im not quite sure how. i particulary like the ones that i think are clear cut only to find out there is a secret hidden ruling that wr always seem to be the trailblazzers in finding.
Click to expand...

Maybe something along the lines of 'football doesn't want to punish fouls that don't cause injury'.
 
BJL_City said:
They've cost other teams a minimum of 12 points this season through VAR cheating.

They also stole a CL semi-final off us.

I won't hear it, they have no leg to stand on and deflectionary tactics trying to deflect from reality is just indefensible really. They would be in relegation mire without it.
Click to expand...


They haven’t var cheated though have they. They’ve had some iffy ones go for them and a few against. If we genuinely believe it’s as crooked as we do (and it is) what benefit is it them giving spurs decisions?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top