UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
My take on it is that Ethihad were going through and still are a tough time and needed a cash injection which came from the government of Abu Dhabi . All the experts are linking it to city but if you look at there portfolio of who they sponcer it is huge Sydney opera House to the MLS with basketball rugby and athletes in between
That's quite a valid point, if they were skint did our guy pay all the other ones as well or were they paid via Govt money & he just at said "it's cool guys I'll take care of City"?
 
Get your facts straight. Also, FFP is one of the things we're in no danger of breaking. We're constantly controlled and checked upon by every financial regulatory body in Italy.

So was we are we sat under special scrutiny from not only UEFA but also the PL.

Goalposts moved again and hey presto........
 
Ask him if he has any thoughts about Sheffield United being Saudi owned, Chelsea and Bournemouth owned by Russian oligarchs, Stoke owned by a family that runs a betting organisation, Brighton owned by a professional gambler, West Ham owned by people who made their money from porn mags and dildos, United owned by a bunch of cowboys with previous experience only in American football and shopping malls, Liverpool run by a shady American with a baseball background whose baseball and football clubs have both been called out for cheating, etc., etc.
Think he’s only there for an hour, plus I can see the conference organisers dragging me away and sacking me
 
Good job you didn`t have one on yer nob. ;)
Don't lower the tone, Oakie. Gardeners Question Time on the radio mentioned the Winsford Flashers so l listened for you to come on especially when all the questions came from posh ladies.
Not a scouse accent around to ask about the old cars in their front gardens on the Overspill estate.
 
I've been rightly corrected on the 'HE' point which I got wrong but other posters have confirmed that Mansour and other members of theroyal family are referred to as 'HH' with their names immediately following (as in HH Sheikh Mansour). 'HH' on its own refers either to the ruler of Abu Dhabi or the crown prince with opinions on this varying. However, what has been established is that 'HH' on its own can't refer to Mansour.

Thanks mate, it’s a complicated business!
 
Even if HH is Mansour, what are alternate sources? Could they be shareholders in the companies that are providing the sponsorship. I don't see how that's proof that Mansour provided the shortfall himself.

And that is our argument to CAS. Based on the information we submitted to UEFA have they followed the right procedure and protocols to arrive at their decision. They reviewed our information, we failed to hit FFP targets and they fined us and gave us a reduced squad. Then some emails came out that they believed to confirm we had misled them. So they reviewed us again and brought in an additional fine and ban. If it is based on an email where HH is referenced, and we have confirmed this isn't who they think it is, then it wouldn't appear they have followed a due process in making their decision. Furthermore, it is clear from the US evidence into gulf airlines, that Etihad secured funding from Abu Dhabi state and that corroborates our argument about who HH is and where those funds came from. Not from our owner as an attempt to be compliant...

Furthermore, why would City get their owner to pump in funds when we missed the (revised) FFP target anyway. That would be pointless. The fact we were fined and punished anyway should have some bearing on the context of this new information UEFA have processed.

CAS will hopefully review the information and feel City provided enough evidence to disprove the hacked emails and their allegations and UEFA didn't undertake a fair process in coming to their verdict.
 
That’s some evidence Colin. You should be on City’s legal team.
Makes me wonder what UEFA have actually got.

If it's just this then surely even they wouldn't go with this as justification added to the state of the 'investigation' process they'd be shooting themselves in both feet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.