No. I didnt.And I didnt deny it. I explained it, twice in fact. Third attempt to help you understand:
I am not discussing climate change. Nowhere have I expanded upon that topic beyond those 2 words.
We were discussing what else Trump coukd have done. My response to you was that he should have engaged with scientists earlier and heeded their advice so as to enable himself to make informed decisions. However, he did not do that and the reason he did not is because he is anti-science in his beliefs.
The reason he has to be anti-science (note also I say has to be) is because his stall has been set out in this regard because the scientific community contradict and belies his belief that climate change is a hoax.
Ergo: the difficulty he caused himself in believing science regarding one thing and not the other manifested itself in him downplaying this pandemic until he actually said it would vanish like a miracle.
Now is it clear enough to you that I am talking about CV and his woeful response to it, amd not climate change?
Also, can others indicate whether I am making myself clear on this please just so I know?