HaalandEffect
Well-Known Member
He might buy a house near him, that’s as close as they get.
Man Utd did buy Harry for 80 millpound, so the same price with Kalidou?
He might buy a house near him, that’s as close as they get.
About 7.How many full Napoli games have you watched this season?
About 7.
No player comes with a guarantee, not a single one.And Soyuncu would suggest he's going for the same method he did with Stones, and that didn't work. Koulibaly comes with a guarantee of quality whatever your ratings suggest. Soyuncu doesn't. He's had one good half season and Leicester I think have been pretty average in 2020.
The most recent report from Castles who while admittedly a twat has been on this before anyone else (is there a Mendes connection?) Says Napoli will accept 40m up front with 10-15m in add ons.
In my book that takes this from "no-brainer" to "what the fuck are you waiting for, quick, quick before they change their minds!" Territory.
No.Man Utd did buy Harry for 80 millpound, so the same price with Kalidou?
The most recent report from Castles who while admittedly a twat has been on this before anyone else (is there a Mendes connection?) Says Napoli will accept 40m up front with 10-15m in add ons.
In my book that takes this from "no-brainer" to "what the fuck are you waiting for, quick, quick before they change their minds!" Territory.
cant see that with the chairman they have, tighter than a ducks arse and openly detests the oil money (as he puts it).... when we come a-knocking, add 20%
I still would, regardless, he’s exactly what we need and would bring out the best in Laporte, who hasn’t even peaked yet!
Just to add, we don’t normally get into bidding wars but if the dippers come to the table, under no circumstance do we allow them to get him, that will be the best defence in Europe, never mind the prem!
About 7.
where have you heard this bud ?Sounds like €45m with €20m add-ons should do it. That's a steal and we should be sewing this up.
City are, not City is.It's naive of you to think that's what I think. More like than not City is hoping this season was an anomaly
City are, not City is.
I really hate that Americanism of making football clubs impersonal. No one would ever say “the All Blacks is playing well”. It would be “the All Blacks are playing well”. And it’s the same with football clubs.
Not in England (where City play), as we use plural group nouns for teams.City is singular to describe a football team. The All Blacks when used as a nickname for the NZ rugby team is a plural. So if you were being grammatically correct you would say City is playing well although I agree it sounds a bit weird.
Not in England (where City play), as we use plural group nouns for teams.
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/group-nouns
“The names of many organisations and teams are also group nouns, but they are usually plural in spoken English:
Barcelona are winning 2–0.
The United Oil Company are prices up by 12 per cent.
and the police is always plural:
The police are offering a £5,000 reward.”
It sounds weird as it’s grammatically incorrect.