it’s a gamble when you stand in the away end with 3000 people you have pissed off, if it was a punt!
Fair point !
it’s a gamble when you stand in the away end with 3000 people you have pissed off, if it was a punt!
Completely agree with it being a calculated gamble, as his own post indicates he does not know for sure.I agree with the click bait killing real journalism; sadly. However I stand by the opinion that it’s a calculated gamble for him
Let's be honest and look at the facts. When we were first accused by that German shite paper the media were already announcing our ban and its damage to us financially and the players that could leave, when were then charged by UEFA nearly every media outlet and jurnos had us bang to rites. Then all of a sudden silence two days before the decision! Think we may just have ripped them a new arse, somebody would have leaked it and it would be all over every paper and media outlet we'd lost !So this could tie in with Cheesy saying it’s not confirmed but looking good?
So City could have been told we’re going to win but the official confirmation is 09:30 Monday.
Someone has described an English High Court process. Not sure it’s identical at CAS. Remember here the judgment is not necessarily shared at this stage. But I think there is no question that they now have the draft media release on the same basis and know the decision. They may or may not have the reasoning.It's not true effectively. I'm told that the process is that CAS communicate a preliminary judgement to the parties a few days before the official release. That gives them a chance to correct any glaring errors which might impact the judgement. However if there's no such errors (and they have to be pretty crucial ones) then it's signed off and released on schedule.
ApplaudsKnowing when you need to button it is a huge gift.
'Wormed'
I wouldn't know,i don't have it !Knowing when you need to button it is a huge gift.
Really?I wouldn't know,i don't have it !
Shut it you !Applauds
Columnae Quintas or Fifth Column , fairly obvious wumDoesn't sound beyond credibility unfortunately... in fact odd lies if they are
https://mobile.twitter.com/ColumnaeQuintus
Apparently the real HH gave evidenceOne, or two, speculating about the possibility of Sheikh Mansour having given evidence.
If you think about this logically.
With the "HH" thing being open to UEFA own interpretation.And UEFA deeming it incriminating.
It could play a Key roll in the CAS out come.
A Man of his standing etc.
Me speculating.
City allover shit PR no protection they run the gauntlet & get away with it
Its about time we start to fuck em all off & ban the ****s.. we are to soft
If Monday comes & we win then we need to change how we manage these horrible scumbags
They capitalise the b in blues and then references unknown (to anyone, including them) “troubling” leaks that are then being seconded by “supposedly reliable sources” that no one has seen.
They are a charlatan.
This is obviously bollocksInteresting news that I've been told is that another of our witnesses at CAS was HH Sheikh Mohammed himself, who testified that the money for the Etihad & other sponsorships came from him, via the Crown Prince Court, and not ADUG.
If that's true then case closed and we've won.
I once met a girl called Maria.
They capitalise the b in blues and then references unknown (to anyone, including them) “troubling” leaks that are then being seconded by “supposedly reliable sources” that no one has seen.
They are a charlatan.