UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Jazzman]

Sounds like the fans of other clubs talking about us, you don’t know anything about what PSG have or haven’t done.

Whatever PSG did or didn't do, it happened because of FFP. We are in the same boat.

 

[remember arthur mann]

https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-an-olive-branch-now-uefa-holds-all-the-power

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

Cheers

You're welcome, although two bit is bigging it up somewhat, imo.

 

[Norbiton]

https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-an-olive-branch-now-uefa-holds-all-the-power

Seems to be suggesting some compromise could be reached before CAS consider the case. Thought the headline was far-fetched, but I think it means UEFA rather than the Adjudicatory Committee is now in charge of the case rather than UEFA having power over City.

 

[Tricky_Trev]

Sounds like the fans of other clubs talking about us, you don’t know anything about what PSG have or haven’t done.

It’s FACT that their sponsorship deal was overvalued by 93m based on an independent analysis versus the figure Leterme decided to go with. Whilst that’s not proof of paying Leterme off, the only logical conclusion is that Leterme was acting with PSG’s, or rather his mate Nasser Al-Khelaifa’s best interests in mind. And a likely reward for doing that would be sort form of bribe, be it money or otherwise.

 

[kevin horlocks wand]

https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-an-olive-branch-now-uefa-holds-all-the-power

I read that a few times and I think a 16 year old work experience student must have ghost written it. It makes fuck all sense.

 

[remember arthur mann]

I read that a few times and I think a 16 year old work experience student must have ghost written it. It makes fuck all sense.

Con by name...….

 

[Marvin]

Seems to be suggesting some compromise could be reached before CAS consider the case. Thought the headline was far-fetched, but I think it means UEFA rather than the Adjudicatory Committee is now in charge of the case rather than UEFA having power over City.

Conn must think his readers are idiots.

He says it is interesting that Soriano says,

“The owner [Sheikh Mansour of Abu Dhabi] has not put any money in this club that has not been properly declared” ... when "Internal City emails published by Der Spiegel in November 2018, which prompted the CFCB investigation, did suggest that Mansour substantially paid the £67.5m sponsorship stated to be from the Abu Dhabi airline Etihad" when a couple of days ago he wrote that the UAE state covered the Etihad sponsorship.

Whatever City do or say will be criticised in some quarters.

 

[waspish]

Sounds like the fans of other clubs talking about us, you don’t know anything about what PSG have or haven’t done.

Only thing we no for a fact is there sponsor was assessed and it’s fair value was calculated as 7m they ended up getting it at 100m take say half that away and they fail ffp.

 

[Nails]

Conn must think his readers are idiots.

He says it is interesting that Soriano says,

“The owner [Sheikh Mansour of Abu Dhabi] has not put any money in this club that has not been properly declared” ... when "Internal City emails published by Der Spiegel in November 2018, which prompted the CFCB investigation, did suggest that Mansour substantially paid the £67.5m sponsorship stated to be from the Abu Dhabi airline Etihad" when a couple of days ago he wrote that the UAE state covered the Etihad sponsorship.

Whatever City do or say will be criticised in some quarters.

Not sure it's a conspiracy from Conn - he's just a bit thick.