UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree with the click bait killing real journalism; sadly. However I stand by the opinion that it’s a calculated gamble for him
Completely agree with it being a calculated gamble, as his own post indicates he does not know for sure.
 
So this could tie in with Cheesy saying it’s not confirmed but looking good?

So City could have been told we’re going to win but the official confirmation is 09:30 Monday.
Let's be honest and look at the facts. When we were first accused by that German shite paper the media were already announcing our ban and its damage to us financially and the players that could leave, when were then charged by UEFA nearly every media outlet and jurnos had us bang to rites. Then all of a sudden silence two days before the decision! Think we may just have ripped them a new arse, somebody would have leaked it and it would be all over every paper and media outlet we'd lost !
 
I'm expecting City to be fully exonerated by CAS @ 9.30am Monday morning

Also expecting City email @ 9.32am confirming 15% increase on ST renewals

Soriano needs to recoup some monies for all that champagne.........................
 
It's not true effectively. I'm told that the process is that CAS communicate a preliminary judgement to the parties a few days before the official release. That gives them a chance to correct any glaring errors which might impact the judgement. However if there's no such errors (and they have to be pretty crucial ones) then it's signed off and released on schedule.
Someone has described an English High Court process. Not sure it’s identical at CAS. Remember here the judgment is not necessarily shared at this stage. But I think there is no question that they now have the draft media release on the same basis and know the decision. They may or may not have the reasoning.
 
They capitalise the b in blues and then references unknown (to anyone, including them) “troubling” leaks that are then being seconded by “supposedly reliable sources” that no one has seen.

They are a charlatan.

 
One, or two, speculating about the possibility of Sheikh Mansour having given evidence.

If you think about this logically.

With the "HH" thing being open to UEFA own interpretation.And UEFA deeming it incriminating.

It could play a Key roll in the CAS out come.

A Man of his standing etc.

Me speculating.
Apparently the real HH gave evidence
 
City allover shit PR no protection they run the gauntlet & get away with it

Its about time we start to fuck em all off & ban the ****s.. we are to soft

If Monday comes & we win then we need to change how we manage these horrible scumbags

the thing is if we do win the case then the game is over for a most of the media that as written the cheat tags without city being proven guilty, manchester city name been dragged through the mud since the uefa ban was handed out in the kangaroo court ? and the media lead with the headlines and called us cheats

boy i hope we win the case because its going to be bigger than winning anything on the pitch ? manchester city will blow the whole lot of them out of the water, so many will have to bend over and say sorry and many should be shown the door in the media room and never be let back in

also come monday if we win ? uefa will be finished and again manchester city should be asking for heads to roll on the board of uefa ? to drag manchester city great name through the gutter without any proven information will cost them dearly and city should take them to the cleaners
 
Interesting news that I've been told is that another of our witnesses at CAS was HH Sheikh Mohammed himself, who testified that the money for the Etihad & other sponsorships came from him, via the Crown Prince Court, and not ADUG.

If that's true then case closed and we've won.
This is obviously bollocks
 
In terms of ‘exoneration’, is that CAS’ role in this or do they merely make a judgement and a statement around that

I.e We find City were corrupt as fuck but unfortunately, from a UEFA perspective, it’s time barred. Or would they simply say ‘these matters are time barred and subject to the previous settlement agreed by all parties’? - I can’t imagine for a minute they will say ‘this was a waste of time and we demand the UEFA kangaroo court be disbanded at once’

My point is, if City’s appeal is upheld, I don’t expect anything other than that. I’m not expecting a judgement which goes into detail around the ‘innocence’.

We’ll see
 
They capitalise the b in blues and then references unknown (to anyone, including them) “troubling” leaks that are then being seconded by “supposedly reliable sources” that no one has seen.

They are a charlatan.


He's undoubtedly a United fan trying to get revenge against Ono for his David Silva exclusive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top