walker_is_faster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 May 2015
- Messages
- 1,374
This is very interesting and probably true.
This is very interesting and probably true.
Now I didn't expect that or maybe he didn't mean it by that consequence. But actually Pep said he has nothing to do with players' motivation. (It makes 80% of Klopp's success...) Maybe he just expects 100% always from the moment they sign, but humans are no robots I thought. He would be giving away a mojor part of team coaching.
Pep Guardiola:
"They have to [motivate themselves]. As managers, we're not here to motivate or tell them what to do. They have to do it. In the first half everything was sloppy and not the right rhythm for this kind of game, when you want to reach a final..."
But the truly great players don't need motivating they are always self motivated to do well and win.He is half right, though. You can only motivate people who want to be motivated.
But the truly great players don't need motivating they are always self motivated to do well and win.
Listened to the podcast this morning when Sam spoke about this. It is ridiculous when you look at the stats. Why it is seemingly our plan B I have no idea. Its a bit embarassing in all honesty, just last week against Southampton we were just throwing hte ball into the box and Bednarek and Stephens just mopped everything up.
Even David Luiz can head the fucking ball away 20 times a game.
We have players who can cross a ball but other than Laporte or Rodri no one else in the squad is likely to win anything aerially.
If we want it to be our plan b we need to have the players to do it, throw Otamendi or Stones up front or just get someone who can do the job e.g. Giroud (first big target man I could think of!). Apparently Pep used to use it at Bayern but of course he had Muller and Lewandowski so its a reasonable plan.What other plan B is there? There's no plan which allows you to break down a team with all 11 players in their own box.
the problem with our team is about Broken Balance.I think there's more of a self-belief issue than a not wanting it issue with the mentality. It's probably down to a lot of things but ever since the Tottenham game and then the Laporte injury a couple of games later the team's developed a bit of softness.
I think that's right in theory. The issue for me is how many of the crosses are floated in and harmlessly headed away verses ones that are fizzed in to dangerous areas on the ground, where at least the ball can bounce around, be deflected, etc. The former leads to those days where it feels like we could play another hour and not get anything. Or we can bring in a credible goal threat from outside the box.What other plan B is there? There's no plan which allows you to break down a team with all 11 players in their own box.
Our options are to try plan A a bit faster, or try to cause a bit of havoc with some crosses.
I'd like to see us run at defenders more when they're queued up in the box to invite penalties, but referees rarely give them.
I think that's right in theory. The issue for me is how many of the crosses are floated in and harmlessly headed away verses ones that are fizzed in to dangerous areas on the ground, where at least the ball can bounce around, be deflected, etc. The former leads to those days where it feels like we could play another hour and not get anything. Or we can bring in a credible goal threat from outside the box.
Agreed, which is why I don't think it's necessarily the tactic as much as its the execution - not varying the types of crosses, taking a few more long shots, running at defenders to draw a pen every now and then. The predictability of it neutralizes its effectiveness.Sometimes I think we want the ball to be headed away.
When teams clear the ball, they all push out to establish an offside line, and quite often we score goals from a clearance that goes straight to a City player and we play the ball back in straight away and take advantage of that extra space they just created.
That's the same reason we go back to the keeper from advanced positions, to make the opposition push out and give us more space to attack again.
That's my only theory for why we do it, because otherwise it makes no sense and Pep generally doesn't do things without reason.
Sometimes I think we want the ball to be headed away.
When teams clear the ball, they all push out to establish an offside line, and quite often we score goals from a clearance that goes straight to a City player and we play the ball back in straight away and take advantage of that extra space they just created.
That's the same reason we go back to the keeper from advanced positions, to make the opposition push out and give us more space to attack again.
That's my only theory for why we do it, because otherwise it makes no sense and Pep generally doesn't do things without reason.
But it's not Pep who puts in cross after cross.
more shots should come from the middle area, 18-25 yards out 6-7 feet high with Kev or whoever blasting on net. These can get through, get deflected or spilled by the keeper anywhere. This is making something happen rather than our outside guys trying to dribble through half the team getting tackled or having a pass blocked.What other plan B is there? There's no plan which allows you to break down a team with all 11 players in their own box.
Our options are to try plan A a bit faster, or try to cause a bit of havoc with some crosses.
I'd like to see us run at defenders more when they're queued up in the box to invite penalties, but referees rarely give them.